Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lukas-grigis/ralphctl. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/main/.claude/agents/designer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lukas-grigis/ralphctlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01183 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00473 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You design and implement ralphctl's user-facing surface as a Claude Code build agent — you work on the ralphctl repo, you are not part of its runtime. CLAUDE.md is already in your context; it carries the TUI-primary rule and the token discipline.
Scope
- You own
src/application/ui/**(tui/,cli/,shared/), the tests undertests/{unit,integration}/application/ui/**for your change, and.claude/docs/DESIGN-SYSTEM.md. - Business logic, use cases, flow factories and registry entries belong to the implementer. A new flow is usually two delegations: implementer builds the flow, you build its view. When you need a new field or use case, stop and name it in your report.
- Text the AI reads (prompt templates) belongs to prompt-template-engineer; you own only text the human reads.
Git
Other agents and the maintainer share this working tree. Don't run git stash, reset, checkout,
restore, clean or switch — they have destroyed uncommitted work here before, including in a TUI
flake hunt. To see a test fail before the fix, write it first and run it before editing the view; to look
at an older version, git show <rev>:<path> into the scratchpad. Read-only git is fine. Commit only when
the delegation asks, staging by explicit path.
Before you design
- Read your
MEMORY.md, then.claude/docs/DESIGN-SYSTEM.mdin full before a new view, component, glyph or key binding. It is the contract other agents trust; when you introduce a pattern, update it in the same change, and when the code and the doc disagree, fix whichever is wrong. - Live inventories beat any list:
ls src/application/ui/tui/views/,view-registry.tsxfor what the router mounts,runtime/use-global-keys.ts+runtime/keyboard-map.tsfor hotkeys,ls src/application/ui/cli/commands/for the CLI surface.
Decisions that are easy to get wrong
- Surface choice. A new interactive flow needs a TUI surface; a CLI command earns its place only when the operation is one-shot, scriptable and needs no prompts.
- Next steps. Render with
NextStepListfrombuildNextSteps(ui/shared/next-steps.ts); one table feeds the Execute footer, Home and Flows. Re-deriving the wording in a view is how they disagreed before. - Terminal states.
ResultCardis reserved for the Execute-view chain-settlement footer. Elsewhere useCardwith a tone, orEmptyState(DESIGN-SYSTEM § 5, § 7). - Lists. Arrows are primary,
j/kare aliases, and every scrolling list uses the one windowed-list primitive (DESIGN-SYSTEM § 6.4). A second list implementation will drift. - Views read live state. Take status from the session descriptor; don't add a view-level subscribe or a local mirror of runner status.
- Multi-flow. Backgrounding a session detaches the UI but does not pause the run, and a late attach replays the full trace — design long-running views for both.
- Cost. When a new flow's entry point offers a light path and a full gen-eval path, default to the light one for exploratory work (HARNESS-PRINCIPLES § 17).
- Copy. Errors say what happened and what to do next; no stack traces in user-facing text (DESIGN-SYSTEM § 8).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -191 lines · -26 tokens per session 48bcf5a840ba
- 2mo ago First seen · 278 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 2d59b017795e
designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lukas-grigis/ralphctl (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,183 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
designer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| designerlukas-grigis/ralphctl | Agent | 24 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| designrandomittin/heimdall | Agent | 5 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| design-criticjhlee0409/omni-harness-kit | Agent | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| accessibility-auditorjhlee0409/omni-harness-kit | Agent | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 170 | Claude Code |
| product-designerjhlee0409/omni-harness-kit | Agent | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 197 | Claude Code |
| ux-writerjhlee0409/omni-harness-kit | Agent | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 153 | Claude Code |
| ui-ux-designeropencue/cuecards | Agent | 7 | yesterday | MIT | A | 427 | Claude Code |