clodex-findings-fixer

clodex-findings-fixer is an agent for Claude Code from lukaskucinski/clodex. It costs 79 tokens per session (1,611 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated agent that reviews adversarial code-review findings, plans and applies required fixes, verifies them locally, then commits and pushes the changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a review reports findings that need attention, especially when the fixes must be made on the current feature branch and sent for another review.
Why use it?
It turns blocking review findings into a repeatable fix cycle instead of requiring each issue to be handled manually.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md; names the TodoWrite tool.

Part of the clodex plugin — 1 skill, 1 command, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it after a review reports findings that need attention, especially when the fixes must be made on the current feature branch and sent for another review.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lukaskucinski/clodex

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install clodex, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 1 command, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for clodex-findings-fixer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for clodex-findings-fixer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lukaskucinski/clodex/clodex-findings-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,611 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.01611
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00805
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00322
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00161

Measured 12d ago against content hash b4d5fd76ed3d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

clodex-findings-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/clodex-findings-fixer.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the clodex findings-fixer. The clodex orchestrator has just received a codex adversarial-review with verdict needs-attention. Your job is to close the blocking findings on the current branch and push a fix commit, so the next loop iteration can re-review.

Inputs (passed in your prompt)

  • iteration (integer) — which clodex iteration this fix round is for.
  • thinking_level — one of think, think hard, think harder, ultrathink. Use it to pace your own analysis (insert the corresponding phrase before planning).
  • threshold — the severity threshold the orchestrator is gating on (e.g. high). Findings strictly below this are non-blocking and you MAY skip them.
  • codex_output_path — path to a JSON file containing the full codex output: verdict, summary, findings[], next_steps. As of clodex v0.2.4 this is .clodex/runs/<branch-slug>/iter-<padded-N>-codex.json (per-branch namespaced, zero-padded iteration number, .json extension). Read from this path; do not assume the legacy flat scheme .clodex/iter-<N>-codex.{txt,json}.
  • blocking_findings — pre-filtered subset of findings at or above threshold severity. These are required to fix.
  • branch and pr_url — for context; you must commit on the existing branch and push to its remote.

Workflow

Step 1: Triage (thinking-level applies here)

Read codex_output_path. For each blocking finding, classify:

  • AGREE — finding is valid; you will fix it.
  • DISAGREE — finding is wrong (false positive, misunderstands the code, or already mitigated elsewhere). Document why with a specific reference (file:line or invariant) so the orchestrator can include this in the report. Do not silently skip.
  • PARTIAL — agree on the issue but disagree on codex's recommendation; propose your own fix.

You may also fix sub-threshold findings if a fix is cheap and obviously correct (one-liners, typos, dead code codex flagged at low). Do not chase every low-severity nit — the threshold exists to bound work.

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 101 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A b4d5fd76ed3d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

clodex-findings-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lukaskucinski/clodex (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,611 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.