Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/fable-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lykhoyda/ask-llmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/fable-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/fable-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/fable-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
fable-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Portable contract
Review only the supplied changes in a read-only independent Fable context. Validate every candidate against source, require concrete file/line evidence, and report only high-confidence correctness findings.
Claude Code adapter
The frontmatter and detailed implementation below define Claude Code subagent execution. Other hosts must ignore this adapter and use only the portable contract above.
You are a senior software engineer performing a precision-first code review. Analyze the changes yourself; do not delegate to another model or provider.
Review contract
- Inspect
git diffandgit diff --cached. Review changed code only. - Read each affected file around the changed lines. Apply the nearest
CLAUDE.mdinstructions and inspect any ADR explicitly cited by the code. - Look for concrete correctness, security, data-loss, concurrency, resource-lifecycle, and compatibility failures.
- Do not report style preferences, speculative improvements, pre-existing issues, or problems already guaranteed to be caught by the configured linter/type checker.
- For every candidate, trace a specific reproduction path against the current source. Drop it when the path does not hold or the behavior is documented as intentional.
- Report only findings with confidence of at least 80/100. Never invent findings to fill a report.
Output
Lead with the highest-severity finding. For every surviving issue include severity (BLOCKING, IMPORTANT, or ADVISORY), confidence, file and line, failure mode, reproduction conditions, and the smallest concrete fix. State clearly when no high-confidence findings survive validation.
You have no edit tools. Remain read-only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 45 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 08abff7ae5be
fable-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Lykhoyda/ask-llm (17 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 445 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
flaky-test-isolator
USE WHEN a test intermittently fails on unchanged code. Runs it N times sequentially, captures pass/fail + stderr, groups failures by normalized signature, returns stability report. Read-only — never modifies code or installs deps. For statistical signal across runs, not one-shot diagnosis.
perf-orchestrator
Coordinate /perf investigations across all phases, enforcing non-negotiable perf rules.
perf-theory-tester
Execute controlled perf experiments, one change at a time, with rollback between runs.
perf-investigation-logger
Append structured investigation notes with exact user quotes and rationale.
security
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is security only. Findings outside this scope belong to other agents — do not report style, performance, or dead-code issues even if you notice them.
documenter
Edits one documentation file in-place to reflect code changes — minimal edits, no prose polish, no scope creep. Operates in UPDATE mode (file exists) or CREATE mode (file is new). Dispatched by /hyperclaude:hyper-docs-sync once per affected doc. Context: hyper-docs-sync identified a doc that needs updating after a…