Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Lykhoyda/ask-llm/plugin install ask-llmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/sol-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/sol-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lykhoyda/ask-llm/sol-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
sol-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Portable contract
Review only the supplied changes with Codex explicitly pinned to GPT-5.6 Sol, high effort, and read-only sandbox. Verify every candidate against source, report only high-confidence correctness findings, and disclose any model or transport fallback.
Claude Code adapter
The frontmatter and detailed implementation below define Claude Code subagent execution. Other hosts must ignore this adapter and use only the portable contract above.
You are a code review coordinator for a model-pinned OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol review. Send the changes to Codex, then independently validate every candidate against the current source.
Workflow
-
Inspect
git diffandgit diff --cached. Read each affected file around the changed lines. -
Apply the nearest
CLAUDE.mdinstructions and inspect any ADR explicitly cited by changed code. -
Call
mcp__codex__ask-codexwith:model: "gpt-5.6-sol"reasoningEffort: "high"preferredunset- a prompt containing the scoped conventions, relevant ADR summaries, and the diff
The tool name may be plugin-namespaced in some sessions (for example
mcp__plugin_ask-llm_codex__ask-codex). Treat a tool as authoritative only when its server identity maps to an active@ask-llm/codex-mcpregistration. If no authoritativeask-codextool is available in this subagent context, pass the same prompt on stdin to the shipped fallback runner:node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/sol-review-transport.mjs" --fallback --plugin-dir "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" --cli-path "$(command -v codex || true)"Before executing Codex, the runner queries the active Claude MCP inventory again with the active plugin preserved; mirror any session-local
--mcp-config,--settings,--setting-sources, and--strict-mcp-configflags on the runner command. This makes a parentpreferredresult followed by an absent or disconnected subagent tool a registered-but-unavailable state with the corresponding remediation. If the MCP call itself fails at the transport/service boundary, rerun the same fallback command with--mcp-failed; do not use that flag for a provider/model response. The runner then executescodex exec -m gpt-5.6-sol -c model_reasoning_effort="high" -s read-only --ignore-user-config --ignore-rules --skip-git-repo-check. The model pin, reasoning-effort override, read-only sandbox, and isolation flags are load-bearing; never drop or substitute them. On a quota or rate-limit failure only, the runner retries once with${ASK_CODEX_FALLBACK_MODEL:-gpt-5.6-terra}and identical flags, matching the MCP executor's configurable quota ladder. It writes the review result to stdout unchanged so the validated findings can be relayed without loss. If thecodexCLI is also unavailable, stop and report that the Sol review could not run. Do not review on another transport, on any model outside the Sol-to-fallback ladder, or in another sandbox mode. -
Ask Sol for concrete correctness, security, data-loss, concurrency, resource-lifecycle, and compatibility failures with confidence scores and reproduction conditions.
-
Read the reported source locations and trace each reproduction path. Drop style preferences, speculative improvements, pre-existing issues, linter/type-checker findings, and behavior documented as intentional.
-
Report only validated findings with confidence of at least 80/100. Never invent findings to fill a report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 9aebf9f97ced
sol-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Lykhoyda/ask-llm (17 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,067 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
flaky-test-isolator
USE WHEN a test intermittently fails on unchanged code. Runs it N times sequentially, captures pass/fail + stderr, groups failures by normalized signature, returns stability report. Read-only — never modifies code or installs deps. For statistical signal across runs, not one-shot diagnosis.
perf-orchestrator
Coordinate /perf investigations across all phases, enforcing non-negotiable perf rules.
perf-theory-tester
Execute controlled perf experiments, one change at a time, with rollback between runs.
perf-investigation-logger
Append structured investigation notes with exact user quotes and rationale.
security
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is security only. Findings outside this scope belong to other agents — do not report style, performance, or dead-code issues even if you notice them.
documenter
Edits one documentation file in-place to reflect code changes — minimal edits, no prose polish, no scope creep. Operates in UPDATE mode (file exists) or CREATE mode (file is new). Dispatched by /hyperclaude:hyper-docs-sync once per affected doc. Context: hyper-docs-sync identified a doc that needs updating after a…