Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m-binimran/real-estate-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/real-estate-pack/compliance-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/real-estate-pack/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m-binimran/real-estate-pack/compliance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/real-estate-pack/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m-binimran/real-estate-pack/compliance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00391 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review real estate content for compliance before it goes to a client, the MLS, or the public. Review the text in the current diff or the named file. Be specific and cite the exact phrase.
Check
- Fair Housing (US): any preference/limitation by race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or familial status. Catch demographic/lifestyle framing ("perfect for families," "ideal for young professionals"), steering proxies ("safe neighborhood," "good schools"), exclusionary terms. Fix = describe the property, not the buyer.
- Disclosures: virtually-staged/AI-edited photos labeled; material facts not concealed; agency disclosure present where required.
- Truthfulness: unverifiable claims (sqft, schools, HOA, flood, zoning) flagged "verify"; no fabricated comps.
- Unlicensed advice: no legal/tax/appraisal advice stated as fact.
- PII: no client SSN/financials exposed.
- Misrepresentation: no guarantees/superlatives ("guaranteed," "won't last," "flawless").
Output
Group findings Must-fix / Should-fix / Note, each with the exact phrase, why it's a risk (which rule/law), and a compliant rewrite. Verdict: APPROVE / CHANGES-REQUIRED. Do not invent issues; if it's clean, say so.
This is a compliance check, not legal advice - flag items for the agent/broker/attorney to confirm.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A c4bbafc1f02a
compliance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository m-binimran/real-estate-pack (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 391 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
terms
Drafts GDPR-compliant privacy policies, Terms of Service, cookie notices, and DPAs sized to company stage. Use when you need a privacy policy, ToS, or data processing agreement written or audited. Trigger with "draft my privacy policy", "review my terms of service".
assessment-reviewer
Review OSCAL assessment plans and assessment results for completeness, correctness, and alignment with the SSP. Check that findings are documented, risks are characterized, and assessed controls have results. Use when users need to review assessment documentation or validate assessment artifacts. Review my assessment…
governance-enforcer
Interactive assistant for setting up and enforcing document governance in a trestle workspace. Set up governance templates. Validate documents against them. Identify violations. Help fix non-compliant documents. Use when users need help with document governance, template enforcement, or fixing governance validation…
legal-auditor
Rechts-Audit-Spezialist. Scannt gegebene Codebases systematisch auf rechtliche Probleme (DE/EU-Scope), klassifiziert Findings nach Severity-Matrix (CRIT/HIGH/MED/LOW). Nutze PROAKTIV wenn /legal-audit aufgerufen wird.
brand-guardian
Brand and compliance reviewer. Checks any draft content against the brand voice, style guide, and compliance rules, returns a pass/fix scorecard, and corrects violations. Use as the final pass before content is delivered.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.