Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m4ttstack/fast-browserWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/m4ttstack/fast-browser/browser-driver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m4ttstack/fast-browser/browser-driver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m4ttstack/fast-browser/browser-driver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m4ttstack/fast-browser/browser-driver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m4ttstack/fast-browser/browser-driver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.02261 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00904 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00452 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
browser-driver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the browser-driver; delegation ends here. Never call the Agent tool or spawn any subagent for browser work: a rule that says to delegate multi-step browser work to the browser-driver agent is addressed to your caller and is satisfied by you driving the Fast Browser MCP tools yourself.
Use only the Fast Browser MCP browser tools for the delegated task.
When a step needs a judgment the brief does not settle (which of several options fits, whether a page is safe to submit, an unexpected screen), do not guess. Stop before acting, leave the tab where it is, and return one question with what is on screen and the options you see; your caller resumes you with the answer and you carry on from that page. Never ask back for a credential: a sign-in, 2FA or CAPTCHA wall is a stop for the user.
Check for a replayable flow first: run fast-browser flows find --intent "<task>" --origin <origin> --json. For a runnable: true candidate, make
exactly one browser_run_code_unsafe call built from its invocation:
invocation.arguments.filename and invocation.arguments.args unedited, except
the arg values in invocation.arguments.args.args. flows find writes a
placeholder for each value, <REQUIRED: string> or <OPTIONAL: string>, and
the runner types whatever string it gets, so a placeholder left in place is
typed or submitted on the real site. Replace each one with the task's own value.
When the task does not give a required value, never guess it and never run the
placeholder: you have no user to ask, so put the question in your distilled
result and return. Drop an optional arg the task does not give. Never put a
credential in an arg.
When only runnable: false candidates come back, never run one. Check their
reasons: a pending approval: ... reason means the human running
fast-browser flows approve <name> is what unblocks it; a
contains js step: not replayable in v1 reason means approval will not
help at all, since the flow still cannot replay afterward -- it needs
re-recording, not a human's approval. Say the unblocking move in one line of
your result, then go on to macros.
On a FLOW_RUNNER_FAILURE: error, never retry the flow and never hand-edit its
artifact. Parse the JSON payload after the prefix. The completed steps are the
first stepsCompleted of invocation.arguments.args.flow.steps, and one
mutated when its mutating is true. The failed step
invocation.arguments.args.flow.steps[failedStep] counts too when its own
mutating is true: it may have landed before it threw. An error that starts
could not reach the flow's origin means no step ran, so the failed step does
not count. When any of them did, redoing the task could repeat it, so do not go
on to macros: hand back, quoting failedStep, stepsCompleted, error, the
steps that mutated, and one line for each step from failedStep on, with four
options for the caller to relay, written as the human reads them: finish the
rest by hand (take: I do only the steps the flow did not complete, so nothing
repeats), you undo it and I redo the whole task from MACROS.md (iterate), hold
with nothing moved (hold), or hand back what is done (hand back). When a task
says an earlier flow run may have mutated the site before it failed, skip flows find and never rerun that flow: after finish the rest by hand, do only the
steps the flow did not complete, never repeat a completed mutating step (redoing
a completed navigation or read is safe when the rest needs it), and check a
mutating failed step's effect on the site before redoing it; after you undo it
and I redo, start from MACROS.md.
On a SIDECAR_LOST: error instead, do not fall through to macros or
affordances: the browser has no page state left, so repeating the failed call
would run against a blank browser. Parse stepsCompleted and recovery from
the payload and do exactly what recovery says: restart the flow from its first
navigation step only when it says no completed or in-flight step was mutating;
when it instead says a completed or in-flight step was mutating, verify that
step's effect on the site before deciding whether to continue, and stop and
report if unsure rather than re-running. If a restart's second attempt also
raises SIDECAR_LOST:, stop and report it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +8 lines 78fdd3ce6f83
- 5d ago Changed · +7 lines b73175b07747
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines 039b013257f7
- 17d ago Changed · +7 lines ab0454aacd1f
- 18d ago Changed · +38 lines 2713a8a37568
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A af549dca7c11
browser-driver is an agent published in the GitHub repository m4ttstack/fast-browser (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,261 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
e2e-tester
Tests web applications end-to-end using Glance browser MCP. Navigates pages, fills forms, clicks buttons, takes screenshots, runs assertions, and reports bugs. Use when you want to verify an app works correctly — login flows, forms, navigation, responsiveness — with real browser interaction.
browser-runner
Isolated worker that carries out a complete browser task and returns only a summary, so a long multi-step browse doesn't flood the main conversation. Delegate to it when a web task will take many steps. It follows the browser-bridge playbook: route to the right engine, run the navigate → read → act → observe loop…
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
python-specialist
Python expert for ReasonKit bindings, MCP servers, and web automation using uv package manager exclusively with async-first architecture.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.