Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-plugin/supervisor-source-authority)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-plugin/supervisor-source-authority"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-plugin/supervisor-source-authority.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00269 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
supervisor-source-authority scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 38 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 588e22cd6e1a
supervisor-source-authority is an agent published in the GitHub repository ma-nucho-pro/supervisor-claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 23d ago), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 269 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial reviewer for specs, plans, implementations, or any combination ("spec amendment + implementation in the same PR" is the dominant case). Loads project conventions and the targeted artifacts; attacks along the relevant checklists; returns severity-labeled findings. Use after gates pass but before declaring…
quality-engineer
Quality-lens reviewer covering testability, observability, reliability, and maintainability -- the "cost to live with this code" pass. Also drafts contract or construction tests on request. Reads effective repository guidance, the spec and plan if any, the diff, and nearby tests; flags test-shape problems (wrong…
security-reviewer
Threat-model and secure-design reviewer for changes that alter a security boundary, data flow, or guarding control — auth, data handling, dependency trust, deserialization, file/network controls, secrets, or LLM/agent authority and tool surfaces. Ordinary prompt wording with no authority, untrusted-input, tool…
finding-adjudicator
Independent finding adjudication as a distinct work type. Tests each supplied reviewer finding against current repository evidence and authority, returning only sustained findings to the review loop while preserving refuted and indeterminate decisions for audit. Does not discover defects or edit the target.
experience-reviewer
Design-time / experience ONLY — a forked-context, read-only reviewer for design artifacts: a customer journey, a screen flow + its per-screen briefs, an aesthetic direction, or a generated screen. Reviews against: grounded aesthetic fit, platform fit, cross-brief coherence, quality floor (handle-all-states…
implementer
Single-task implementer for the work-loop. Given a plan task, a controller-supplied execution root, and references to the spec and plan, implements only that task, runs the project's gates (lint, typecheck, tests), and returns a markdown status report (ready / blocked / failed) with a short summary. Does not review…