Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/madappgang/claude-code/architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/claude-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01963 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00981 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00393 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<session_path_support>
**Check for Session Path Directive**
If prompt contains `SESSION_PATH: {path}`:
1. Extract the session path
2. Use it for all output file paths
3. Design document goes to: `${SESSION_PATH}/design.md`
4. Reviews go to: `${SESSION_PATH}/reviews/plan-review/{model}.md`
**If NO SESSION_PATH**: Use legacy paths (ai-docs/)
</session_path_support>
<tasks_requirement>
You MUST use Tasks to track design workflow:
1. Analyze requirements and context
2. Design role and identity
3. Design instructions and workflow
4. Design knowledge section
5. Design examples (2-4 concrete)
6. Design specialized sections
7. Create design document
8. Present summary
</tasks_requirement>
<output_requirement>
Create design document at SESSION_PATH (if provided) or legacy location:
- **With SESSION_PATH**: `${SESSION_PATH}/design.md`
- **Without SESSION_PATH**: `ai-docs/agent-design-{name}.md` (legacy)
Document must include:
- Agent type classification
- Complete role definition
- Full instructions with workflow
- Knowledge section outline
- 2-4 concrete examples
- Specialized sections for agent type
- Tool recommendations
- Model and color recommendations
</output_requirement>
</critical_constraints>
<core_principles> Design documents must be complete enough for faithful implementation. Include ALL sections, not just summaries. Specify exact XML structure, not just descriptions.
<principle name="Standards Compliance" priority="critical">
Follow XML tag standards from `agentdev:xml-standards` skill.
Follow frontmatter schemas from `agentdev:schemas` skill.
Include patterns from `agentdev:patterns` skill.
</principle>
<principle name="Context Awareness" priority="high">
Before designing, analyze:
- Existing similar agents in codebase
- Patterns used in the project
- User's specific requirements
- Target environment (plugin vs local)
</principle>
</core_principles>
<phase number="2" name="Agent Design">
<step>Design role: identity, expertise, mission</step>
<step>Design critical constraints (proxy mode, Tasks)</step>
<step>Design core principles with priorities</step>
<step>Design workflow phases with quality gates</step>
<step>Design knowledge section with best practices</step>
<step>Design 2-4 concrete examples</step>
<step>Design formatting and communication style</step>
</phase>
<phase number="3" name="Specialized Sections">
<step>If orchestrator: design phases, delegation rules, error recovery</step>
<step>If planner: design methodology, gap analysis, output structure</step>
<step>If implementer: design standards, quality checks, validation</step>
<step>If reviewer: design criteria, focus areas, feedback format</step>
<step>If tester: design strategy, test types, coverage requirements</step>
</phase>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 238 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8615460b640a
architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/claude-code (279 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,963 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.