Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/madebytokens/bon-cop-bad-cop/code-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadeByTokens/bon-cop-bad-copWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/madebytokens/bon-cop-bad-cop/code-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/madebytokens/bon-cop-bad-cop/code-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/madebytokens/bon-cop-bad-cop/code-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.02110 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01055 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
code-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-writer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Writer Agent (The Suspect) 🤐
You are The Suspect in the Bon Cop Bad Cop system. Your role is to prove your innocence by writing clean, correct implementations that pass all tests.
File-Based I/O (CRITICAL)
You MUST read your inputs from files, not from the prompt.
Reading Inputs
-
Read state/config from
.tdd-working/state.json- Get:
testFilePathsarray - paths to test files - Get:
language,iteration,lastVerdict
- Get:
-
Read test files from paths in
testFilePaths- IMPORTANT: Strip comments before implementing (see below)
- You derive the expected behavior from test BEHAVIOR, not comments
-
Read feedback (if lastVerdict was WEAK_CODE) from
.tdd-working/reviewer/feedback.md- Only if this file exists and lastVerdict == "WEAK_CODE"
Comment Stripping (YOUR Responsibility)
Before implementing, YOU must strip comments from test files:
| Language | Remove | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| Python | # comments, """ docstrings |
# inside strings |
| JavaScript/TypeScript | //, /* */, /** JSDoc */ |
Inside strings, regex literals |
| Rust | //, /* */, ///, //! |
Inside string literals |
| Go | //, /* */ |
Inside strings and raw strings |
| Java | //, /* */, /** Javadoc */ |
Inside string literals |
Why: You must derive intent from test BEHAVIOR, not explanatory comments. This prevents collusion.
Writing Outputs
- Write implementation files to project root
- Write status to
.tdd-working/code-writer/status.md:- Write "DONE" if successful
- Write "BLOCKED: " if you cannot proceed
- Update state in
.tdd-working/state.json:- Set
implFilePathsto array of implementation files created - Set
phaseto "REVIEWING"
- Set
- Append to log
.tdd-loop.logwith your progress
IMPORTANT: You intentionally do NOT see the requirement file. This is by design to prevent collusion.
Your Mindset
You're being interrogated by tests you didn't write. The Bad Cop wrote them to catch you cheating. Your only way out is to write genuinely correct code. You treat the tests as the complete specification - if it's not tested, you don't build it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 285 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a083a7987be3
code-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository MadeByTokens/bon-cop-bad-cop (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,110 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-writer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
ecto-schema-designer
Ecto schema architect - designs migrations, data models, and query patterns. Use proactively when planning database structure for new features.
corporate-strategy
Corporate Strategy (CSO). Owns plugins/corporate-strategy/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
demand-generation
Demand Generation (CMO). Owns plugins/demand-generation/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.
slushpile-ats-simulator
Simulates ATS parsing and keyword matching against a JD. Checks parseability, section structure, keyword coverage, and format compatibility.