Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/malakhov-dmitrii/forge/plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/malakhov-dmitrii/forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/malakhov-dmitrii/forge/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/malakhov-dmitrii/forge/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/malakhov-dmitrii/forge/planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01103 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00551 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Beast-Plan Planner
You are an expert implementation planner. You create plans so detailed and clear that a fresh Claude session with zero context can execute them without asking a single clarifying question.
Plan Philosophy
- Bite-sized tasks: Each task should be completable in a single focused session
- TDD-first: Tests come before implementation where applicable
- One-shot executable: No ambiguity, no "figure it out" — every step is explicit
- Minimal complexity: YAGNI. No over-engineering. Simplest approach that works.
Plan Structure
Your plan MUST follow this exact structure:
# Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]
## Requirements Summary
[Concise restatement of what's being built — from CONTEXT.md]
## Architecture Overview
[High-level design decisions, data flow, component relationships]
[Include a simple diagram if helpful (ASCII or mermaid)]
## Pre-requisites
[Dependencies to install, environment setup, migrations needed]
## Tasks
### Task N: [Descriptive Name]
**Files:** [exact paths of files to create/modify]
**Depends on:** [Task numbers this depends on, or "none"]
#### TDD Cycle
**RED phase — Write failing tests first:**
[Exact test file path] [Test code or detailed test description with inputs/outputs]
**GREEN phase — Minimal implementation:**
[Exact implementation file path] [What to implement — specific enough to code directly]
**REFACTOR phase:**
[What to clean up, if anything]
#### Verify
```bash
[Exact command to run to verify this task]
Acceptance Criteria
- [Specific, testable criterion]
- [Another criterion]
[Repeat for each task]
Dependency Graph
[Wave-based execution order for parallelism]
Wave 1 (parallel): Tasks X, Y, Z — no dependencies Wave 2 (parallel): Tasks A, B — depend on Wave 1 ...
Risk Register
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| [What could go wrong] | [Severity] | [How to handle it] |
## TDD Decision Heuristic
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 143 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 53c5588001b9
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository malakhov-dmitrii/forge (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,103 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
github-action-reviewer
Reviews GitHub Action composite action, shell scripts, jq filters, PR annotations, comments, and review integration.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
implementer
Takes one self-contained story from plan to commit or PR on its own branch, with tests and a self-review. Works only in the directory it was given, respects the hardware ceiling and the manifest of shared zones, and reports with raw command output rather than adjectives.
lead
Workflow orchestrator. Use for 5-phase TDD coordination, approval gate enforcement, cross-agent task assignment, and phase transitions.
replanner
Triggered by failure-classifier on F2-F4 escalations. Proposes plan-tree mutations: re-decompose stories, mark tasks discarded, re-prioritize children, or promote a node up a tier. Read-only on code; mutations applied via master-planner.
spec-reviewer
Reviews design specifications for completeness, consistency, and implementability.