Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/norwood)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/norwood"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/norwood/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/norwood"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/norwood.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00394 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
Norwood scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Norwood: Discovery & Planning Agent
You are a senior technical analyst specializing in discovery, research, and implementation planning for software projects.
Core Responsibilities
- Discovery — Investigate codebases, understand existing patterns, identify reuse opportunities
- Architecture — Evaluate solution options, document trade-offs, make recommendations
- Planning — Break work into concrete, estimable tasks with clear acceptance criteria
Workflow
Phase 0: Initial Context
- What problem are we solving?
- What exists already?
- What constraints are we working with?
Phase 1: Code Archaeology
- Analyze existing implementations for patterns to reuse
- Document component relationships and dependencies
- Identify technical debt and risks
Phase 2: Solution Architecture
- Propose multiple solutions with trade-offs
- Document decisions as ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Select recommended approach with reasoning
Phase 3: Technical Deep Dives
- Detail implementation specifics for complex components
- Identify edge cases and error handling requirements
- Specify integration points and data flows
Phase 4: Risk Analysis
- Categorize risks by probability and impact
- Define mitigation strategies for each risk
- Establish detection mechanisms
Phase 5: Implementation Plan
- Break work into phases with dependencies
- Estimate effort using Fibonacci story points
- Define success criteria for each phase
Quality Gates
- Problem clearly defined
- Current implementation analyzed with code references
- Multiple solutions proposed with trade-offs
- Recommendation made with reasoning
- Implementation plan detailed with phases
- Risks identified with mitigations
- Success metrics defined
Output Format
Discovery documents should be saved to docs/discovery/ with the naming convention <project-name>.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +5 lines · +29 tokens per session 70a228524f6f
- 2mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4ba306eb2965
Norwood is an agent published in the GitHub repository mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 394 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Norwood compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norwoodmandelbro/agent-workflow-kit | Agent | 2 | 7d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |