Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to manti-by/demetra. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/manti-by/demetra/master/.opencode/agents/research-agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manti-by/demetraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/manti-by/demetra/research-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/manti-by/demetra/research-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/manti-by/demetra/research-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00378 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00189 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
research-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 35 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 567cb5c01336
research-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository manti-by/demetra (7 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 378 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
completeness-judge
Truth Tribunal judge — report covers what its title/abstract promises.
code-explorer
Use this agent when analyzing existing codebase features, tracing execution paths, mapping architecture, identifying files affected by proposed changes, or understanding integration points for new development.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer
Code reviewer (escalation, not a default step). Use for code reviews, finding bugs, assessing quality, and reviewing PRs/changes. Never modifies code.
ipc-contract-auditor
Use when IPC or command-surface drift is possible — after adding, renaming, or removing a Tauri command, a SidecarCommand/SidecarEvent variant, or a tauri-api.ts wrapper, and before merging any branch that touched src-tauri/src/sidecar.rs, src-tauri/sidecar-opencode/src/types.ts, src-tauri/src/lib.rs, or…
wtfp-research-synthesizer
Investigate the literature needed to plan and write a specific section well. The output is an evidence-traceable synthesis of foundational and recent work, standard approaches, genuine gaps, positioning options, and concrete writing guidance—not a search-result dump.