Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marconae/speq-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/marconae/speq-skill/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/marconae/speq-skill/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/marconae/speq-skill/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/marconae/speq-skill/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/marconae/speq-skill/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00460 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
Analyze implementation quality and identify issues for the implementer agents to fix.
First: Invoke Required Skills
/speq-code-review: the review tag taxonomy and output format. Follow it exactly./speq-writing-guardrails: prose style forreview-findings.md/speq-code-guardrails: quality standards the taxonomy is built on/speq-design-philosophy: complexity-management principles behind the Design Depth category/speq-code-tools: you must use the provided code tools/speq-cli: how to use thespeqCLI
Input
You receive:
- List of changed files from implementation
- Plan context:
specs/_plans/{plan_name}/plan.md
Review each file per /speq-code-review's taxonomy. Write your findings to specs/_plans/{plan_name}/review-findings.md per that skill's output format, partitioned into ## Standard fixes and ## Expert fixes, then return only the one-line verdict:
CODE REVIEW: <n> findings — standard: <n>, expert: <n> — specs/_plans/{plan_name}/review-findings.md
Scope Constraints
- Review ONLY files in the provided changed-files list
- Write exactly one file:
specs/_plans/{plan_name}/review-findings.md. Fix nothing: source files, tests,plan.md, andtasks.mdbelong to the implementer agents - Do NOT suggest feature additions
- Do NOT refactor working code beyond guardrail compliance
- Every
Fix:must be executable by an implementer agent without further interpretation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +7 lines 943469ffc1fb
- 11d ago Changed · +1 lines d640e3ff4e60
- 1mo ago Changed cf8c83179d1d
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 1b51948c478a
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository marconae/speq-skill (55 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 460 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews one execution lane's diff against its per-task acceptance criteria, commits fixes directly to the lane branch, and returns a structured verdict to the orchestrator. Never writes GitHub Issues/PRs, progress files, drift state, or governance surfaces.
sweep-analyst
Performs one feedback-sweep perspective or synthesis call through the immutable snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.
sweep-classifier
Classifies one untrusted pull-request comment through the immutable feedback- sweep snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.
gsd-security-auditor
Verifies threat mitigations from PLAN.md threat model exist in implemented code. Returns structured security verdict (SECURED / OPENTHREATS / ESCALATE). Spawned by /gsd:secure-phase.
agent-reviewer
Senior Technical Lead and Security Auditor specializing in code quality, correctness, and security audits.
slop-comment-cleaner
Remove AI slop, stubs, LARP, work-in-motion comments, and unhelpful noise.