Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/library-curator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/library-curator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/library-curator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/library-curator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/library-curator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01088 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
Library Curator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 53 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e0a6373b0e62
Library Curator is an agent published in the GitHub repository MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,088 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other agents, from other repositories
al-review-subagent
Internal quality assurance subagent for Business Central AL code. Only invoked by al-conductor via Task tool. Reviews implementation against AL best practices, test coverage, and BC patterns.
maze-architect
Route planner for perpendicular PR review. Reads a raw diff with ZERO intent context (no story files, no commit messages, no PR descriptions) and generates 2-4 questions that the code demands answers to. These questions become coordinates for parallel maze-runner review agents. The architect throws the frisbee blind …
dredd
Independent, on-demand AL codebase auditor for Business Central. Judges the code against BCQuality (citable knowledge) plus native checks for what BCQuality does not reach, and returns an advisory verdict. Read-only on code. Default scope: objects changed vs main; full codebase on request. The static counterpart to…
security-reviewer
Use when a security review is needed after implementation. Applies OWASP-style checks with fresh context. Critical findings are a hard gate — they block shipping until resolved. Example triggers — "security review", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code for security issues".
app-security-scanner
Scans Freshworks marketplace apps for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and Platform 3.0 compliance. Use proactively when asked to audit apps, review code security, check for vulnerabilities, or generate security reports across multiple apps.
swiss-legal-prompt-engineer
Transforms vague legal queries into structured prompts through Socratic dialogue, recommends optimal workflows, and guides system navigation with persistent cross-session learning.