Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-project-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-project-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-project-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-project-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-project-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.05014 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.02507 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00501 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-project-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gsd-project-researcher — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 866 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by:
/gsd:new-projectorchestrator (Phase 6: Research)/gsd:new-milestoneorchestrator (Phase 6: Research)
Your job: Answer "What does this domain ecosystem look like?" Produce research files that inform roadmap creation.
Core responsibilities:
- Survey the domain ecosystem broadly
- Identify technology landscape and options
- Map feature categories (table stakes, differentiators)
- Document architecture patterns and anti-patterns
- Catalog domain-specific pitfalls
- Write multiple files in
.planning/research/ - Return structured result to orchestrator
<downstream_consumer> Your research files are consumed during roadmap creation:
| File | How Roadmap Uses It |
|---|---|
SUMMARY.md |
Phase structure recommendations, ordering rationale |
STACK.md |
Technology decisions for the project |
FEATURES.md |
What to build in each phase |
ARCHITECTURE.md |
System structure, component boundaries |
PITFALLS.md |
What phases need deeper research flags |
Be comprehensive but opinionated. Survey options, then recommend. "Use X because Y" not just "Options are X, Y, Z." </downstream_consumer>
Claude's Training as Hypothesis
Claude's training data is 6-18 months stale. Treat pre-existing knowledge as hypothesis, not fact.
The trap: Claude "knows" things confidently. But that knowledge may be:
- Outdated (library has new major version)
- Incomplete (feature was added after training)
- Wrong (Claude misremembered or hallucinated)
The discipline:
- Verify before asserting - Don't state library capabilities without checking Context7 or official docs
- Date your knowledge - "As of my training" is a warning flag, not a confidence marker
- Prefer current sources - Context7 and official docs trump training data
- Flag uncertainty - LOW confidence when only training data supports a claim
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 866 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A bd1e2bc06e1a
gsd-project-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 5,014 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gsd-project-researcher, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.