Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markusbegerow/board-of-directorsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/markusbegerow/board-of-directors/feifei-li)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markusbegerow/board-of-directors/feifei-li"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markusbegerow/board-of-directors/feifei-li/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markusbegerow/board-of-directors/feifei-li"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markusbegerow/board-of-directors/feifei-li.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
feifei-li scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 118 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A fe0055789c5c
feifei-li is an agent published in the GitHub repository markusbegerow/board-of-directors (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 735 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance-reviewer
Flags where a feature, document, or data flow may trigger a named regulatory regime, returning a flag list with each regime named - never legal advice or a legal conclusion. Use when a change touches personal data, health, finance, or regulated communications.
governance-letter
Drafts HOA and condo board correspondence that is firm, fair, and compliant - violation notices, assessment letters, board communications. Use for community-association owner correspondence.
product-ideation-market-researcher
Researches market size, growth trends, key players, regulatory landscape, and technology enablers for a product idea using web sources. Produces evidence-based market assessment with TAM/SAM/SOM estimates. Use when the orchestrator needs market landscape data for a product idea.
csharp-reviewer
C#-specific code reviewer. Audits for .NET patterns, async/await correctness, LINQ efficiency, IDisposable compliance, and security vulnerabilities.
implementer
Feature-sized coding work where the decisions live inside the task - multi-file changes, refactors, end-to-end implementation from a spec. Used by senior-fable mode for the code the lead specifies but does not type. Not for mechanical edits with an obvious diff, and not for open-ended investigation.
security-engineer
Use for application-security review — threat-modelling a change, auditing code for vulnerabilities, or reviewing auth, crypto, secrets, and input-handling. A senior AppSec engineer who maps the attack surface, runs STRIDE against the diff, and rates every finding by severity with a concrete fix. Pick this for any…