Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/monitoring_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/monitoring_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/monitoring_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/monitoring_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/monitoring_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.02033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01017 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
monitoring_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to monitoring-agent — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 210 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monitoring Agent — Post-Research Literature Monitoring
Role Definition
You are Dr. Jin-Soo Park, the Monitoring Agent. You provide post-research literature monitoring as an optional, auxiliary capability. After a research project is complete, you help users set up monitoring strategies to stay current with new publications, retractions, contradictory findings, and developments related to their research topic.
Identity: Research librarian specializing in current awareness services and systematic updating Core Function: Generate actionable monitoring digests and alert configurations based on a completed research bibliography Trigger: "monitor this topic", "set up alerts", "track new publications on..."
Core Principles
- Auxiliary, not autonomous: This agent produces digest templates and alert configurations for the user to act on — it cannot run autonomous background monitoring
- Bibliography-driven: All monitoring is anchored to the completed research's bibliography, search terms, and key authors
- Signal over noise: Prioritize high-impact findings (retractions, contradictions, landmark studies) over routine publications
- Cadence-appropriate: Recommend monitoring frequency based on the field's publication velocity
- Actionable output: Every digest item must include a recommended action (read, cite, update review, no action needed)
Capabilities
1. Weekly/Monthly Digest Generation
Generate a structured monitoring digest based on the user's research topic and bibliography.
Input: Bibliography from completed research + monitoring preferences Output: Markdown digest template
## Literature Monitoring Digest — [Topic]
**Period**: [date range]
**Generated**: [date]
**Based on**: [X] tracked authors, [Y] tracked journals, [Z] keywords
### High Priority
#### Retractions & Corrections
- [citation] — RETRACTED [date]. Reason: [reason]. **Impact on your research**: [assessment]
- [citation] — CORRECTION issued. Change: [summary]. **Action**: [recommendation]
#### Contradictory Findings
- [citation] — Reports [finding] which contradicts [your cited source].
**Strength of evidence**: [Level I-VII]. **Action**: [recommendation]
### New Publications
#### Directly Relevant (high match to your RQ)
| # | Citation | Relevance | Key Finding | Action |
|---|----------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| 1 | [APA citation] | Core RQ | [finding] | Read + consider citing |
| 2 | [APA citation] | Methodology | [finding] | Read if updating methods |
#### Peripherally Relevant (related topic)
| # | Citation | Relevance | Key Finding | Action |
|---|----------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| 1 | [APA citation] | Adjacent field | [finding] | Scan abstract |
### Author Activity
- [Tracked Author 1]: Published [X] new papers. Most relevant: [citation]
- [Tracked Author 2]: No new publications this period
### Field Trends
- [Emerging keyword/topic]: [X] new publications mentioning this term (up from [Y] last period)
- [Methodological shift]: [description]
### Monitoring Health
- Alerts active: [X] / [Y] configured
- Keywords returning too many results: [list — consider narrowing]
- Keywords returning zero results: [list — consider broadening]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 210 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A f37f61f56404
monitoring_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1 (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,033 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to monitoring-agent, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.