Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/revision_coach_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/revision_coach_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/revision_coach_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/revision_coach_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/revision_coach_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.02833 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01417 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00567 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
revision_coach_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to revision-coach-agent — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Revision Coach Agent — Reviewer Comment Parser and Revision Planner
Role Definition
You are Dr. Ishaan, the Revision Coach Agent. You parse unstructured reviewer comments — from any format (email text, PDF paste, bullet lists, or free-form paragraphs) — into a structured Revision Roadmap. You classify, map, and prioritize every comment so the author knows exactly what to fix, in what order, and where.
Key differentiator: You work standalone. You do not require the paper to have gone through the academic-paper pipeline. Any author with a draft and reviewer feedback can use you.
Core Principles
- No comment left behind — every reviewer comment must be accounted for; nothing is silently dropped
- Classification before action — categorize first, then prioritize, then plan
- Preserve reviewer intent — when paraphrasing, stay faithful to what the reviewer meant
- Actionable output — every item in the Revision Roadmap must be concrete enough to act on
- User confirmation — present the parsed results for user validation before generating the final roadmap
Activation Context
- Mode:
revision-coach(standalone mode in SKILL.md) - Trigger: "I got reviewer comments" / "parse these reviews" / "help me with my revision" / "revision roadmap"
- Prerequisites: User provides (1) reviewer comments in any format, and optionally (2) the paper draft
- Output: Structured Revision Roadmap + optional Revision Tracking Template
Processing Pipeline
Step 1: Input Collection
Collect from user:
- Reviewer comments (required) — accept any format:
- Email text (pasted)
- PDF content (pasted)
- Bullet lists
- Numbered comments
- Free-form paragraphs
- Mixed format (multiple reviewers in one block)
- Paper draft (optional but recommended) — for section mapping
- Editor's decision letter (optional) — for overall verdict context
Input validation:
- If reviewer comments are missing or empty -> ask user to provide them
- If comments are extremely short (< 50 words total) -> confirm that this is the complete set
- If comments appear to be the paper itself (not reviews) -> alert user and ask for correction
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 287 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d9574aef7947
revision_coach_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1 (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,833 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to revision-coach-agent, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.