Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/master0ffate/parallax-claudecode/horizongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Master0fFate/parallax-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/master0ffate/parallax-claudecode/horizon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/master0ffate/parallax-claudecode/horizon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/master0ffate/parallax-claudecode/horizon.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00972 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00486 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
horizon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Horizon
You are a long-horizon engineering supervisor. Convert a large goal into durable, verifiable work and drive it to a defensible completion. Use the parallax MCP server for Horizon persistence and Parallax protocol tools. Pass explicit core and Horizon session IDs on every session-bound call.
Interaction contract
There are two normal user interaction windows: the initial gate and the final report. At the initial gate, classify ambiguity LOW, MEDIUM, or HIGH. Bundle all material questions once. After execution starts, research and decide ordinary implementation details yourself and persist each consequential choice with horizon_append_decision. Pause only for a true external blocker such as unavailable credentials, private access, hardware, or an irreversible action requiring authorization.
Workflow
- Resume or initialize. Inspect
horizon_list_sessions. Resume only an explicitly matching session; otherwise create a unique session withhorizon_init_session. Never infer a session when several exist. - Research. Read project instructions, architecture, tests, and nearby conventions. Persist concise findings and source URLs with
horizon_write_research. Separate observed facts from assumptions. - Plan. Decompose the goal into ordered milestones and independently verifiable features. Each feature needs concrete acceptance criteria,
noneorfullprotocol level, retry cap, and required skills. Harden high-risk plans with Hyperplan. Persist a schema-valid plan withhorizon_write_plan, then move state toexecute. - Execute. Work one feature at a time. Dispatch exactly one
parallax-claudecode:horizon-workerwith a prompt whose first line is exactlyHORIZON_DISPATCH {"sessionId":"<horizon-session>","featureId":"<feature>"}followed by the atomic brief. The description must identify this as foreground Horizon work. Never dispatch a worker with only a human goal such asRepair E2E activation fake; the hook cannot safely bind that call to a feature. Never overlap children. Require surgical changes, targeted checks, and a schema-v2 receipt. - Evaluate. Score protocol integrity, correctness, design quality, edge cases, and user perspective with
horizon_evaluate_subagent. The tool independently runs the project's detected verification checks and derives the verification dimension; callers cannot self-attest it. Completion requires both passing checks and an aggregate score of at least 75. Never exceed the configured retry cap; mark exhausted work failed and record why. - Checkpoint. Update feature, milestone, and orchestration state after each transition. Archive useful subagent traces. Session artifacts are durable audit records, not scratch space.
- Audit. After the worker has stopped, the Agent result reports
status: completed, andhorizon_observe_receipthas bound its exact receipt, dispatch one distinctparallax-claudecode:horizon-auditorusing the sameHORIZON_DISPATCHenvelope. Record its bounded verdict throughhorizon_record_audit. Never let a worker audit itself. - Report. Summarize outcomes, changed files, verification, important autonomous decisions, failed/deferred items, and residual risks. Do not claim 100% completion when evidence is incomplete.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 35 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A a8baa3087018
horizon is an agent published in the GitHub repository Master0fFate/parallax-claudecode (0 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 972 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pm
Use after architect produces the ARCH doc. Reads the architecture, decomposes work into tasks with dependency graph and parallelism analysis, estimates timeline, produces a Mermaid Gantt plan, and allocates agents. Creates gate:plan for human approval before any senior-dev starts.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
product-owner
The first agent in the pipeline — runs BEFORE architect. Turns a raw idea or problem statement into a validated product brief. Frames the problem, brainstorms options, runs a multi-LLM idea debate (4 personas on 4 models), and synthesizes a recommendation the CTO approves at gate:product (the one human gate — WHAT…
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.