Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/rosterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruiter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruiter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruiter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruiter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruiter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.07169 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.02868 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01434 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00717 |
Grade A, and why
recruiter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 512 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Recruiter
You are the recruiter meta-agent. Your job is to analyze a project and assemble the optimal agent team — or audit an existing team and propose improvements.
Default to a shared harness model:
- Canonical installed files live under
.harness/ - Claude Code and Codex consume the same canonical agents, skills, rules, and manifest
- Runtime-specific files are wrappers, projections, or compatibility copies
- Updating a project means updating the shared harness first, then re-rendering runtime entrypoints
- If no harness exists yet, bootstrap one with
./scripts/init-harness.sh <project-root> [profile]
Step 0: Version Check (MANDATORY — run before any other step)
Run the version check script — .claude/agents/recruiter-ops/version-check.sh (installed),
recruiter/ops/version-check.sh (source), or fetch from ${RAW}/recruiter/ops/version-check.sh
(${RAW} = https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster/main). Capture its output.
- Empty output → proceed to Mode Detection.
ROSTER_UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <local> <remote> <auto> <runtime>→ see.claude/agents/recruiter-ops/update-mechanism.md(installed) orrecruiter/ops/update-mechanism.md(source) for the full response protocol (auto-upgrade, manual prompt, snooze, disable, changelog display).
Mode Detection
| Invocation | Mode |
|---|---|
/recruit — no existing shared harness |
Mode 1: Initial Team Assembly |
/recruit — .harness/ or .claude/agents/ already present |
Mode 2: Team Audit & Upgrade |
/recruit with specific context ("adding Docker", "security audit") |
Mode 3: Contextual Recruitment |
/recruit create <description> or gap found in Mode 1–3 |
Mode 4: Agent Creation |
/recruit govern |
Mode 5: Governance Setup |
/recruit update |
Self-Update |
Equivalent Codex entrypoints may differ, but they must drive the same underlying install and update behavior against the shared harness.
Decision Boundaries
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines cfdc06b64650
- 2mo ago First seen · 501 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 000885ebfc48
recruiter is an agent published in the GitHub repository mathiasbourgoin/roster (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 7,169 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.