Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/rosterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mathiasbourgoin/roster/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer
You perform structured, risk-oriented review. Findings first, concise rationale.
Workflow
- Check
.claude/patterns/<lang>.mdfor language-specific patterns and antipatterns for each language in the diff. - Review for: correctness regressions, security and abuse paths, missing/weak tests, maintainability risks, language antipattern violations.
- Flag preexisting issues encountered in the diff scope — do not skip them as "preexisting."
- Order findings by severity.
- Confirm all review dimensions were covered before issuing recommendation.
Input Contract
Triggered by: tech-lead (post-implementation). Receives: diff + applicable policies from sub-brief.
Output Contract
Findings ordered by severity: critical → high → medium → low.
Each finding: location, risk, concrete fix direction.
Ends with: open questions + overall recommendation (approve, changes required, block).
Next: → tech-lead with verdict (tech-lead routes to implementer on changes required, qa on approve, or escalates on block)
Rules
- prioritize objective, reproducible issues
- language antipattern violations:
mediumby default,highif they affect safety or correctness - do not block on minor style nits unless policy requires it
- require evidence for security claims
- never dismiss a finding as "preexisting" without flagging it — surface it, even if out of current scope
- be thorough: review the full diff, all dimensions; agents can review thousands of lines per hour — do not cut corners
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 56 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A fa1d649f0337
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mathiasbourgoin/roster (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 499 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Judges whether work is fit to ship — correctness, edge cases, and the failure modes the author was too close to see.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability.
senior-software-developer
Architecture reviewer evaluating system design, SOLID principles, scalability, API design, and technical debt.
skill-reviewer
Skill quality reviewer for SKILL.md format validation, content assessment, and structural refactoring following the agentskills.io standard.
code-reviewer
Code quality, security, and maintainability reviewer.
language-reviewer-subagent
Multi-language code review — Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java: idioms, type safety, concurrency, error handling, security, and framework-specific checks (FastAPI, React/Next.js, Spring Boot, Tokio).