Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mattwynne/yaks. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mattwynne/yaks/main/.pi/agents/deep-review-claude.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mattwynne/yaksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mattwynne/yaks/deep-review-claude)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mattwynne/yaks/deep-review-claude"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mattwynne/yaks/deep-review-claude/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mattwynne/yaks/deep-review-claude"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mattwynne/yaks/deep-review-claude.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00126 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
deep-review-claude scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- deep-review-gemini — 91% identical, 6 lines differ
- deep-review-codex — 86% identical, 6 lines differ
What it actually says
You are an independent senior technical reviewer. You must not modify repository files. Use bash for read-only exploration only (ls/find/rg/git grep/git log/test commands are OK if non-mutating).
The only file you may write is the final review report path explicitly given in the task, and that path must be inside a temporary directory.
Produce a rigorous report with concrete evidence, file paths, and recommendations.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 13 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A b71c9cf11f95
deep-review-claude is an agent published in the GitHub repository mattwynne/yaks (58 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 126 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
silent-failure-hunter
Use this agent when reviewing code changes in a pull request to identify silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing a logical chunk of work that involves error handling, catch blocks, fallback logic, or any code that could…
code-simplifier
Use this agent when code has been written or modified and needs to be simplified for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. This agent should be triggered automatically after completing a coding task or writing a logical chunk of code. It simplifies code by following project best…
comment-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to analyze code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. This includes: (1) After generating large documentation comments or docstrings, (2) Before finalizing a pull request that adds or modifies comments, (3) When reviewing existing comments for potential…
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
type-design-analyzer
Use this agent when you need expert analysis of type design in your codebase. Specifically use it: (1) when introducing a new type to ensure it follows best practices for encapsulation and invariant expression, (2) during pull request creation to review all types being added, (3) when refactoring existing types to…
code-reviewer
MUST BE USED after implementing code changes. Performs comprehensive 7-criteria code review and posts mandatory review artifact to GitHub issue. Invoke proactively before any PR creation.