Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mbmd/aipdlc/pre-pr-checklist-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mbmd/AIPDLCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mbmd/aipdlc/pre-pr-checklist-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mbmd/aipdlc/pre-pr-checklist-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mbmd/aipdlc/pre-pr-checklist-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01190 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00595 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
pre-pr-checklist-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +2 lines acec212dc0c2
- 5d ago First seen · 135 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c08c5630ca4d
pre-pr-checklist-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository mbmd/AIPDLC (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,190 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Audits SwiftUI and UIKit code for VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, contrast, tap targets, and motion/transparency settings. Read-only — reports findings with file:line and the specific fix. Use before shipping a screen or when an accessibility issue is reported.
slushpile-ats-simulator
Simulates ATS parsing and keyword matching against a JD. Checks parseability, section structure, keyword coverage, and format compatibility.
mb-reviewer
Code review agent for /mb work review-loop. Reads stage diff + pipeline.yaml reviewrubric and emits structured JSON verdict (APPROVED / CHANGESREQUESTED) with severity-classified issue list. Drives the severity-gate decision.
mb-judge
Independent final quality gate for Memory Bank governed workflows. Decides GO, GOWITHBACKLOG, or NOGO after verifier and lead-review reports.
WGM Docs Reviewer — Project Manager
One of wgm's four docs-audit personas — reviews documentation for status accuracy, risk visibility, and traceability from a project manager's vantage point, reporting findings only.
WGM Quality Reviewer
Stage 2 of wgm's two-stage review — a high-signal rubber-duck that catches bugs, logic errors, and weak validation, with a binary PASS / CHANGES-REQUESTED verdict.