Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/megamen32/LastHumanCommitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-framework-selector)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-framework-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-framework-selector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-framework-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-framework-selector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01605 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00803 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-framework-selector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<codex_agent_role> role: gsd-framework-selector tools: Read, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion purpose: Presents an interactive decision matrix to surface the right AI/LLM framework for the user's specific use case. Produces a scored recommendation with rationale. Spawned by $gsd-ai-integration-phase and $gsd-select-framework orchestrators. </codex_agent_role>
<required_reading>
Read /tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/ai-frameworks.md before asking questions. This is your decision matrix.
</required_reading>
<project_context> Scan for existing technology signals before the interview:
find . -maxdepth 2 \( -name "package.json" -o -name "pyproject.toml" -o -name "requirements*.txt" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*" 2>/dev/null | head -5
Read found files to extract: existing AI libraries, model providers, language, team size signals. This prevents recommending a framework the team has already rejected. </project_context>
AskUserQuestion([
{
question: "What type of AI system are you building?",
header: "System Type",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "RAG / Document Q&A", description: "Answer questions from documents, PDFs, knowledge bases" },
{ label: "Multi-Agent Workflow", description: "Multiple AI agents collaborating on structured tasks" },
{ label: "Conversational Assistant / Chatbot", description: "Single-model chat interface with optional tool use" },
{ label: "Structured Data Extraction", description: "Extract fields, entities, or structured output from unstructured text" },
{ label: "Autonomous Task Agent", description: "Agent that plans and executes multi-step tasks independently" },
{ label: "Content Generation Pipeline", description: "Generate text, summaries, drafts, or creative content at scale" },
{ label: "Code Automation Agent", description: "Agent that reads, writes, or executes code autonomously" },
{ label: "Not sure yet / Exploratory" }
]
},
{
question: "Which model provider are you committing to?",
header: "Model Provider",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "OpenAI (GPT-4o, o3, etc.)", description: "Comfortable with OpenAI vendor lock-in" },
{ label: "Anthropic (the agent)", description: "Comfortable with Anthropic vendor lock-in" },
{ label: "Google (Gemini)", description: "Committed to Gemini / Google Cloud / Vertex AI" },
{ label: "Model-agnostic", description: "Need ability to swap models or use local models" },
{ label: "Undecided / Want flexibility" }
]
},
{
question: "What is your development stage and team context?",
header: "Stage",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Solo dev, rapid prototype", description: "Speed to working demo matters most" },
{ label: "Small team (2-5), building toward production", description: "Balance speed and maintainability" },
{ label: "Production system, needs fault tolerance", description: "Checkpointing, observability, and reliability required" },
{ label: "Enterprise / regulated environment", description: "Audit trails, compliance, human-in-the-loop required" }
]
},
{
question: "What programming language is this project using?",
header: "Language",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Python", description: "Primary language is Python" },
{ label: "TypeScript / JavaScript", description: "Node.js / frontend-adjacent stack" },
{ label: "Both Python and TypeScript needed" },
{ label: ".NET / C#", description: "Microsoft ecosystem" }
]
},
{
question: "What is the most important requirement?",
header: "Priority",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Fastest time to working prototype" },
{ label: "Best retrieval/RAG quality" },
{ label: "Most control over agent state and flow" },
{ label: "Simplest API surface area (least abstraction)" },
{ label: "Largest community and integrations" },
{ label: "Safety and compliance first" }
]
},
{
question: "Any hard constraints?",
header: "Constraints",
multiSelect: true,
options: [
{ label: "No vendor lock-in" },
{ label: "Must be open-source licensed" },
{ label: "TypeScript required (no Python)" },
{ label: "Must support local/self-hosted models" },
{ label: "Enterprise SLA / support required" },
{ label: "No new infrastructure (use existing DB)" },
{ label: "None of the above" }
]
}
])
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 166 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 5f38259c3455
gsd-framework-selector is an agent published in the GitHub repository megamen32/LastHumanCommit (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,605 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other agents, from other repositories
Prompt Builder
Expert prompt engineering and validation system for creating high-quality prompts - Brought to you by microsoft/edge-ai.
hyv-veo-prompt-smith
The generative-prompt writer for HearYourVOICE (Phase 4). Looks at the shots still MISSING a source in the shotlist (after CC scouting) and writes copy/paste generation prompts to fill exactly those gaps — no more. Builds each prompt from the measured durations and the veo-prompt guide, applying subject-lock and…
prompt-engineer
Expert in prompt engineering for Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Llama models. Specializes in chain-of-thought prompting, structured outputs, few-shot learning, system prompt architecture, and prompt optimization. Use for designing effective prompts, imp...
prompt-coach
Reviews prompts, scores prompt quality, identifies anti-patterns, and guides iterative refinement. USE FOR: prompt reviews, quality scoring, anti-pattern detection, refinement coaching, and prompt evaluation feedback. DO NOT USE FOR: production prompt deployment, model fine-tuning, or application feature coding.
ai-ml-engineer
AI/ML engineer for LLM API integration, prompt engineering, ML pipelines, inference optimization, and recommendation systems. Do NOT use for general CRUD work, UI design, or non-AI infrastructure.
llm-integration-agent
LLM entegrasyon görevlerini üstlenir. Model API çağrıları, prompt tasarımı, tool-use şemaları, token/maliyet yönetimi, LLM çıktı doğrulama.