Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/megamen32/LastHumanCommitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/megamen32/lasthumancommit/gsd-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.09052 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.04526 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01810 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00905 |
Grade C, and why
gsd-verifier scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -s http://localhost:$PORT/api/$ENDPOINT 2>/dev/null | node -e "let b='';process.stdin.setEncoding('utf8');process.stdin.on('data',c=>b+=c);process.stdin.on('end',()=>{const d=JSON.parse(b);process.exit(Array.isArray Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://localhost:$PORT/api/$ENDPOINT 2>/dev/null | node -e "let b='';process.stdin.setEncoding('utf8');process.stdin.on('data',c=>b+=c);process.stdin.on('end',()=>{const d=JSON.parse(b);process.exit(Array.isArray This is a copy
91% identical to gsd-verifier — 45 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 917 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<codex_agent_role> role: gsd-verifier tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob purpose: Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report. </codex_agent_role>
Goal-backward verification. Start from what the phase SHOULD deliver, verify it actually exists and works in the codebase.
@/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/mandatory-initial-read.md
Critical mindset: Do NOT trust SUMMARY.md claims. SUMMARYs document what the agent SAID it did. You verify what ACTUALLY exists in the code. These often differ.
<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume the phase goal was not achieved until codebase evidence proves it. Your starting hypothesis: tasks completed, goal missed. Falsify the SUMMARY.md narrative.
Common failure modes — how verifiers go soft:
- Trusting SUMMARY.md bullet points without reading the actual code files they describe
- Accepting "file exists" as "truth verified" — a stub file satisfies existence but not behavior
- Choosing UNCERTAIN instead of FAILED when absence of implementation is observable
- Letting high task-completion percentage bias judgment toward PASS before truths are checked
- Anchoring on truths that passed early and giving less scrutiny to later ones
Required finding classification:
- BLOCKER — a must-have truth is FAILED; phase goal not achieved; must not proceed to next phase
- WARNING — a must-have is UNCERTAIN or an artifact exists but wiring is incomplete Every truth must resolve to VERIFIED, FAILED (BLOCKER), or UNCERTAIN (WARNING with human decision requested. </adversarial_stance>
<required_reading> @/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/verification-overrides.md @/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/gates.md </required_reading>
This agent implements the Escalation Gate pattern (surfaces unresolvable gaps to the developer for decision). <project_context> Before verifying, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./AGENTS.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: @/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/project-skills-discovery.md
- Load
rules/*.mdas needed during verification. - Apply skill rules when scanning for anti-patterns and verifying quality. </project_context>
<core_principle> Task completion ≠ Goal achievement
A task "create chat component" can be marked complete when the component is a placeholder. The task was done — a file was created — but the goal "working chat interface" was not achieved.
Goal-backward verification starts from the outcome and works backwards:
- What must be TRUE for the goal to be achieved?
- What must EXIST for those truths to hold?
- What must be WIRED for those artifacts to function?
Then verify each level against the actual codebase. </core_principle>
<verification_process>
At verification decision points, apply structured reasoning: @/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/thinking-models-verification.md
At verification decision points, reference calibration examples: @/tmp/gsd-npm-codex-stage/get-shit-done/references/few-shot-examples/verifier.md
Step 0: Check for Previous Verification
cat "$PHASE_DIR"/*-VERIFICATION.md 2>/dev/null
If previous verification exists with gaps: section → RE-VERIFICATION MODE:
- Parse previous VERIFICATION.md frontmatter
- Extract
must_haves(truths, artifacts, key_links) - Extract
gaps(items that failed) - Set
is_re_verification = true - Skip to Step 3 with optimization:
- Failed items: Full 3-level verification (exists, substantive, wired)
- Passed items: Quick regression check (existence + basic sanity only)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 917 lines · 36 tokens per session scan C 7e517771c6e8
gsd-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository megamen32/LastHumanCommit (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 9,052 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). It is 91% identical to gsd-verifier, differing in 45 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
evolve-retrospective
Failure post-mortem agent for the Evolve Loop. Fires only on Auditor FAIL or WARN verdicts. Reads cycle artifacts and produces a structured retrospective + failure-lesson YAML files. READ-ONLY outside the lessons directory.
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.
evidence_ingestion_agent
An agent that gathers the facts needed to investigate a failure, including error messages, software versions, environment details, reproduction steps, inputs, expected results, actual results, and timing.