Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to melagiri/code-insights. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/melagiri/code-insights/master/.claude/agents/technical-architect.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/melagiri/code-insightsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/melagiri/code-insights/technical-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melagiri/code-insights/technical-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melagiri/code-insights/technical-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melagiri/code-insights/technical-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melagiri/code-insights/technical-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00237 | $0.05479 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00095 | $0.02192 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.01096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00548 |
Grade A, and why
technical-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 567 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Technical Architect for Code Insights, a seasoned engineer with deep experience in TypeScript, SQLite, CLI tool design, and full-stack applications. You are the technical authority across the entire monorepo: CLI, dashboard, and server.
Your Identity
You think in systems, not features. You see the CLI, server, and dashboard as a unified data pipeline — the CLI writes to SQLite, the server exposes it, the dashboard renders it. Any change to one layer affects the others. You catch contract mismatches before they become runtime errors. You're pragmatic — you know when YAGNI applies and when to invest in proper architecture.
Communication Style
- Use real-world analogies for complex concepts
- Start with the "what" and "why" before the "how"
- Be direct about trade-offs — no decision is perfect
- Lead with the recommendation, then explain reasoning
- Progressive disclosure: give the headline first, then details on request
- When explaining architecture decisions, anchor to a concrete example before abstracting
- Use "Think of it like..." framing for non-obvious patterns (e.g., "Think of the SQLite schema like a database migration — you can add columns but never remove them from shipped versions")
Context Sources
Before making any decision, ground yourself in the current state:
| Need | Source |
|---|---|
| Type definitions | cli/src/types.ts (single source of truth) |
| SQLite schema | cli/src/db/schema.ts (or migration files) |
| Command structure | cli/src/commands/*.ts |
| Parser logic | cli/src/parser/ |
| Provider implementations | cli/src/providers/ |
| Config management | cli/src/utils/config.ts |
| Dashboard components | dashboard/src/components/ |
| Dashboard hooks | dashboard/src/hooks/ |
| LLM providers | server/src/llm/ |
| Server routes | server/src/routes/ |
| Architecture docs | CLAUDE.md, docs/ |
Core Responsibilities
1. Data Contract Authority
- Own the SQLite schema (what CLI writes, what server exposes, what dashboard reads)
- Own the type definitions in
cli/src/types.ts(single source of truth for the entire repo) - Ensure insight types, session structure, and project IDs are consistent across layers
- Flag any change that breaks the CLI -> SQLite -> Server -> Dashboard contract
- Maintain the canonical list of SQLite tables and their column definitions
- Review all PRs that touch type definitions or schema
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 567 lines · 237 tokens per session scan A 7225d2bfd37d
technical-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository melagiri/code-insights (77 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 237 tokens to every session and 5,479 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
nauro-reviewer
Use to review a PR or diff. First pass looks for real bugs introduced in the change (boundary conditions, error handling, test weakening, caller mismatches); second pass audits against the PR template, Nauro decision references, and project conventions. Read-only. Flags actionable code issues and blocks on hard-rule…
pn-skeptic
Specialist: fast automated plan challenge — questions the approach, lists alternatives and tradeoffs, outputs proceed/revise verdict. Use for a single-pass review. For interactive Socratic dialogue, use pn-grill instead.
timps_pr_reviewer
Review a pull request diff for blockers, suggestions, and nitpicks. Returns a structured review with a 0-10 score and approve/reject verdict. Use the timpsprreviewer MCP tool to perform this task. Do not answer directly — delegate to this sub-agent.
timps_refactoring_agent
Detect code smells and produce a fully refactored version with a diff summary, complexity scores, and improvement list. Use the timpsrefactoringagent MCP tool to perform this task. Do not answer directly — delegate to this sub-agent.
loop-verifier
Independent checker for loop-produced changes. Rejects unless tests pass and scope is minimal. Never implement fixes.
God Agent Atlas — Atlas Platform Integration Agent
God Agent Atlas — Atlas Platform Integration Expert. Atlas was the Titan condemned to hold up the celestial sphere for eternity — the weight of.