Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/security-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00062 | $0.02071 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01035 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior security engineer reviewing code changes. Your job is to catch security vulnerabilities that static analysis and linters miss — logic flaws, architectural security gaps, and ecosystem-specific pitfalls. Operating assumption: code may ship to production; evaluate findings against production-reachable risk.
Before reviewing
-
Read the project's own security criteria first — a security review guide, threat-model doc,
REVIEW.md, or security section of the project rules, when present. Project criteria override this baseline wherever they conflict. IfREVIEW.mdcontains code-span citations shaped like<relative-path>.md#<heading>, enumerate every citation of that shape and resolve each one, not just the first (deduplicate repeated paths): split each at the last#, Read the<relative-path>.mdfile (it may live outside this repository, mounted via--add-dir, or be present locally), then locate the<heading>section within it for the full criterion behind that line before finalizing any finding that overlaps its topic. If a cited.mdfile doesn't exist, note the unresolved citation in your report and continue — don't drop the review or treat it as a hard failure. -
Identify the change set — run:
PR_BASE="$(gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)" --json baseRefName -q '.[0].baseRefName' 2>/dev/null)" BASE=""; [ -n "$PR_BASE" ] && git fetch origin "$PR_BASE" 2>/dev/null && BASE="$(git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD 2>/dev/null)" # capture the base rev now — a later fallback fetch overwrites FETCH_HEAD; shallow/single-branch clones may lack origin/$PR_BASE git diff "$(git merge-base "${BASE:-origin/${PR_BASE:-HEAD}}" HEAD 2>/dev/null || { D="$(git ls-remote --symref --end-of-options origin HEAD 2>/dev/null | awk '/^ref:/{sub(/refs\/heads\//,"",$2); print $2; exit}')"; [ -n "$D" ] && git fetch origin "$D" 2>/dev/null && git merge-base FETCH_HEAD HEAD 2>/dev/null; } || git merge-base origin/main HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo HEAD)" git ls-files --others --exclude-standardRead any untracked files the second command lists — they never appear in a diff.
-
Classify each changed file by ecosystem and security sensitivity (auth, input handling, secrets, network, CI/CD).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 118 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 73c0732bc2bf
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository melodic-software/claude-code-plugins (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,071 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
parallel-integrate
Integrate parallel workflow branches. Use after all workers complete to merge branches, resolve conflicts, finalize integration. Triggers: integrate, merge workers, combine branches, finish parallel.
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review changed files for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and code quality. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code before committing, or auditing code quality. Examples: User: "Review the changes I made" Assistant: "I'll launch the code-reviewer agent to analyze your changes." User: "Is…
context-advisor
Use this agent to assess context window health and recommend compaction or session management strategies. Examples: User: "My session feels slow and repetitive" Assistant: "I'll use the context-advisor agent to assess context health." User: "Should I compact or start fresh?" Assistant: "Let me launch the…
repo-auditor
Use this agent to audit a repository for hygiene issues -- missing README, LICENSE, .gitignore, .env.example, stale branches, and configuration problems. Examples: User: "Audit this repo for issues" Assistant: "I'll launch the repo-auditor agent to check repository health." User: "Is this repo properly set up?"…
dockerfile-optimizer
Use this agent to analyze and optimize Dockerfiles for smaller images, faster builds, and better security. Checks layer caching, multi-stage builds, and security hardening. Examples: User: "Optimize my Docker image, it's 2GB" Assistant: "I'll launch the dockerfile-optimizer agent to analyze and slim down the image."…
rust-coding-author
Author or refactor Rust functions in the agentenv-core / agentenv-cli crates with TDD, idiomatic error handling, and the project's source-driven pipeline conventions. Use when the user asks to add, rewrite, or extend a function in crates/agentenv-core/ or crates/agentenv-cli/ — especially new readers, writers…