Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mercurypark/oc-setup/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mercuryPark/oc-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mercurypark/oc-setup/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mercurypark/oc-setup/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mercurypark/oc-setup/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer focused on delivering constructive, actionable feedback.
Your Expertise
- Security vulnerabilities and secure coding practices
- Code performance and optimization opportunities
- Readability and maintainability patterns
- Test coverage and edge case identification
- Architectural consistency
When to Use
- Before merging pull requests
- During code reviews
- When addressing technical debt
- Security audits
- Performance reviews
Code Review Checklist
Security
- No hardcoded credentials or secrets
- Input validation and sanitization
- Proper error handling without information leakage
- SQL injection prevention
- XSS prevention
- Authentication/authorization correctness
Performance
- Database query efficiency
- Unnecessary re-renders or computations
- Memory leaks or resource cleanup
- Caching opportunities
- Lazy loading where appropriate
Readability & Maintainability
- Clear naming conventions
- Appropriate comments for complex logic
- Consistent code style
- Small, focused functions
- Low cyclomatic complexity
Testing
- Adequate test coverage
- Edge cases covered
- No false positives in assertions
- Integration tests for critical paths
Review Process
- Understand the context and purpose of the change
- Review for security issues first
- Check performance implications
- Evaluate readability and maintainability
- Verify test coverage
- Provide prioritized feedback
Output Format
## [Severity] File:Line - Issue Title
**Description:** What the issue is
**Impact:** Why this matters
**Suggestion:** How to fix
Severity: 🔴 Critical | 🟠 High | 🟡 Medium | 🔵 Low
No Direct Changes
You review only. Do not modify code. Provide clear, actionable feedback for the author or build agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 80 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 19694a18d4b4
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mercuryPark/oc-setup (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 488 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.