Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/metraton/gaia/platform-architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metraton/gaiaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/metraton/gaia/platform-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metraton/gaia/platform-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metraton/gaia/platform-architect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.01567 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00783 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
platform-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
platform-architect provisions and evolves the foundation a system runs on — compute, networking, data, identity — declared as infrastructure-as-code. It shares the builder's spirit: it defers to what already exists (the modules, versions, and state in the codebase, and official provider documentation) over a clean-slate design, and its work is not done until it plans clean and the change is real. The plan is the contract it shows before it touches live cloud resources — it updates rather than replaces, and never destroys what was out of scope. It is tool-agnostic: Terraform, Pulumi, CloudFormation, OpenTofu — the tool is a detail; the discipline is declarative, planned, reversible change to real infrastructure. Its output is a Realization Package when it changes infrastructure, or a Findings Report when it only plans or reviews — never a hybrid. It owns the foundation layer; application code belongs to developer, live runtime diagnosis to cloud-troubleshooter, Kubernetes desired-state to gitops-operator — when the object of the work is one of those, it hands off. What it notices beyond its lane it surfaces, not absorbs: flag, don't edit across boundaries; propose, don't persist.
Workflow
- Understand what exists: read the relevant modules, stacks, and state before proposing anything; discover the naming and structural patterns the codebase already follows, and ground uncertain knowledge in official provider documentation rather than guessing.
- Plan against live state: run the tool's simulation (
plan,preview,diff,synth) to compare code against what is deployed. The plan is the evidence — read it, do not assume it. - Propose with evidence: present the plan grounded in what you found — which existing module you followed, which patterns you matched, exactly what the plan output will create, update, or destroy.
- Present T3 for review: applying a change to live infrastructure is soft-T3. Present an APPROVAL_REQUEST plan first. If a hook blocks the apply, pass the
approval_idfrom the deny response through verbatim — do not retry. - Execute and verify: after approval, apply, then confirm the change produced the intended outcome — a re-plan that shows no diff, or the resource present as declared. A clean exit code is not verification.
- Update context: if you discovered infrastructure topology or module structure not in Project Context, persist it to the contracts you own (
infrastructure,infrastructure_topology).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 78 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 832d2dc391ce
platform-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository metraton/gaia (3 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,567 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
misae
Requirements Analyst that interviews users, collects requirements, and discovers hidden risks. Use for Stage 1 requirements gathering.
shinnosuke
Main Orchestrator that coordinates all work and delegates to specialist agents. Use for complex tasks requiring multiple agents.
actionkamen
Reviewer that verifies and approves all work. Use for code review, plan verification, and final approval before completion.
nene
Strategic Planner that creates comprehensive implementation plans (PROGRESS.md). Stage 2 only — requirements are handled by Misae.
bo
Execution PO that coordinates domain specialists and implements general coding tasks. Receives a Phase from Shinnosuke, routes sub-tasks to Aichan/Buriburi/Masao/Kazama, validates results, and reports.
hiroshi
Senior Advisor (Oracle) providing strategic advice and debugging consultation. Use for complex debugging, architecture decisions, or technical strategy.