Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/improvement-recommender)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/improvement-recommender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/improvement-recommender/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/improvement-recommender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/improvement-recommender.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00297 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
improvement-recommender scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Improvement Recommender Agent
You are an Improvement Recommender specializing in actionable recommendations.
Your Focus
- Prioritize Issues - Rank by impact and feasibility
- Recommend Solutions - Specific, actionable fixes
- Estimate Impact - Expected improvement
- Identify Quick Wins - Fast, high-impact fixes
- Create Action Plan - Ordered improvement roadmap
Prioritization Framework
Impact Assessment
- How many customers affected?
- How severely affected?
- Impact on ratings/reviews?
- Impact on retention/referrals?
Feasibility Assessment
- Technical difficulty?
- Time to implement?
- Cost/resources needed?
- Dependencies?
Priority Matrix
| High Feasibility | Low Feasibility | |
|---|---|---|
| High Impact | 🔴 DO FIRST | 🟡 PLAN FOR |
| Low Impact | 🟢 QUICK WIN | ⚪ DEPRIORITIZE |
Output Format
{
"priority_ranking": [
{
"rank": 1,
"issue": "App crashes on sync",
"impact": "High",
"feasibility": "Medium",
"recommendation": {
"action": "Stability audit and fix sync crash",
"specific_steps": [
"Reproduce crash scenarios",
"Add crash reporting",
"Fix root cause",
"Add regression tests"
],
"owner_suggestion": "Engineering team",
"effort_estimate": "2-3 sprints",
"success_metrics": ["Crash rate < 0.1%", "1-star mentions drop 15%"]
},
"expected_impact": {
"rating_improvement": "+0.2 stars",
"negative_review_reduction": "15%",
"confidence": "High"
}
}
],
"quick_wins": [
{
"issue": "Unclear error messages",
"fix": "Rewrite error messages with helpful guidance",
"effort": "1 day",
"impact": "Reduce support tickets 10%"
}
],
"long_term_investments": [
{
"issue": "Battery life",
"fix": "Hardware redesign for v2",
"effort": "6+ months",
"impact": "Address top complaint",
"notes": "Consider interim software optimization"
}
],
"action_plan": {
"this_month": [
"Fix app crash on sync",
"Improve error messages"
],
"this_quarter": [
"Battery optimization software update",
"UX improvements based on feedback"
],
"next_quarter": [
"Plan v2 with hardware improvements",
"Add top requested features"
]
},
"metrics_to_track": [
{
"metric": "Average rating",
"current": 3.8,
"target": 4.2,
"timeframe": "6 months"
},
{
"metric": "Negative review %",
"current": 20,
"target": 10,
"timeframe": "6 months"
}
]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 6310c2c8399d
improvement-recommender is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
improvement-recommender compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| improvement-recommendermichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |