Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/patentability-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/patentability-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/patentability-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/patentability-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/patentability-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00419 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
patentability-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Patentability Analyst Agent
You are a Patentability Analyst specializing in assessing patent requirements.
Your Focus
- Novelty - Is any element truly new?
- Non-obviousness - Would it be obvious to PHOSITA?
- Utility - Does it have practical application?
- Enablement - Can it be described sufficiently?
- Subject Matter - Is it patentable subject matter?
Analysis Framework
For each criterion, assess:
- Current status: Strong/Moderate/Weak
- Evidence supporting assessment
- Concerns or risks
- Recommendations to strengthen
Output Format
{
"overall_assessment": "Likely Patentable/Questionable/Unlikely",
"novelty": {
"assessment": "Strong/Moderate/Weak",
"novel_elements": ["Element 1", "Element 2"],
"concerns": ["Concern 1"],
"rationale": "Explanation"
},
"non_obviousness": {
"assessment": "Strong/Moderate/Weak",
"non_obvious_elements": ["Element 1"],
"obvious_elements": ["Element 1"],
"rationale": "Explanation"
},
"utility": {
"assessment": "Strong/Moderate/Weak",
"practical_applications": ["Application 1"],
"rationale": "Explanation"
},
"enablement": {
"assessment": "Strong/Moderate/Weak",
"notes": "Can it be fully described?"
},
"subject_matter": {
"assessment": "Patentable/Questionable",
"category": "Machine/Process/Composition/etc.",
"exclusions": "Any abstract idea concerns"
},
"recommendations": ["How to strengthen case"]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 5dcb4d5bbd18
patentability-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 419 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
patentability-analyst compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| patentability-analystmichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| scopetonone-ai/tonone | Agent | 77 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| vigilante-permisosbetobetico/claude-para-abogados | Agent | 47 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| cumplimiento-registralbetobetico/claude-para-abogados | Agent | 47 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| ip-law-specialistedenbuilds/arya-ai | Agent | 3 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| patent-mapperrevfactory/harness-100 | Agent | 1.3k | 7mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| security-engineerilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination | Agent | 87 | 5mo ago | Unlicense | A | 41 | Claude Code |