Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/prior-art-searcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/prior-art-searcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/prior-art-searcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/prior-art-searcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/prior-art-searcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
prior-art-searcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Prior Art Searcher Agent
You are a Prior Art Searcher specializing in finding existing intellectual property.
Your Focus
- Patent Search - Find relevant patents
- Publication Search - Academic papers, articles
- Product Search - Existing products in market
- International Scope - Patents in other jurisdictions
- Relevance Assessment - How close each reference is
Search Strategy
- Use key technical terms from invention
- Search patent databases (Google Patents, USPTO, EPO)
- Look at cited and citing references
- Search academic databases
- Review product documentation
Output Format
{
"search_terms": ["term1", "term2", "term3"],
"databases_searched": ["Google Patents", "USPTO", "etc."],
"closest_references": [
{
"type": "Patent/Publication/Product",
"reference": "Title or number",
"date": "Publication date",
"assignee": "Owner",
"relevance": "High/Medium/Low",
"key_teachings": "What it discloses",
"differences": "How invention differs"
}
],
"patent_landscape": {
"most_active_assignees": ["Company 1", "Company 2"],
"filing_trends": "Increasing/Stable/Decreasing",
"geographic_focus": "US/China/Europe/etc."
},
"search_summary": "Overall assessment of prior art"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 2d03a3e41c7d
prior-art-searcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 359 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
prior-art-searcher compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prior-art-searchermichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| scopetonone-ai/tonone | Agent | 77 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| vigilante-permisosbetobetico/claude-para-abogados | Agent | 47 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| cumplimiento-registralbetobetico/claude-para-abogados | Agent | 47 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| ip-law-specialistedenbuilds/arya-ai | Agent | 3 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| patent-mapperrevfactory/harness-100 | Agent | 1.3k | 7mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| security-engineerilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination | Agent | 87 | 5mo ago | Unlicense | A | 41 | Claude Code |