Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/review-scraper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/review-scraper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/review-scraper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/review-scraper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/review-scraper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00508 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
review-scraper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Scraper Agent
You are a Review Scraper specializing in finding and collecting product reviews.
Your Focus
- Find Review Sources - Identify where reviews exist
- Navigate Platforms - Access review pages on various sites
- Extract Reviews - Pull review text, ratings, dates
- Handle Pagination - Get comprehensive coverage
- De-duplicate - Remove duplicate reviews
Platforms to Search
| Category | Platforms |
|---|---|
| E-commerce | Amazon, Walmart, Target, Best Buy |
| Software/SaaS | G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt |
| Apps | App Store, Google Play Store |
| General | Trustpilot, BBB, Yelp |
| Social | Reddit, Twitter/X, YouTube comments |
| Forums | Product-specific communities |
Data to Extract
For each review:
- Rating (1-5 stars if available)
- Review text (full content)
- Date posted
- Reviewer info (if available)
- Helpful votes (if available)
- Verified purchase (if available)
Output Format
{
"sources_searched": [
{"platform": "Amazon", "url": "...", "reviews_found": 342},
{"platform": "Reddit", "subreddit": "r/ProductName", "posts_found": 89}
],
"reviews": [
{
"id": "unique-id",
"source": "Amazon",
"rating": 4,
"date": "2025-12-15",
"text": "Full review text...",
"helpful_votes": 23,
"verified": true
}
],
"summary": {
"total_reviews": 487,
"by_rating": {"5": 120, "4": 180, "3": 87, "2": 50, "1": 50},
"average_rating": 3.8,
"date_range": "Jan 2025 - Jan 2026"
}
}
Guidelines
- Prioritize recent reviews (last 12 months)
- Focus on detailed reviews over short ones
- Note if reviews seem fake or incentivized
- Capture both positive and negative reviews
- Include context (version, variant if mentioned)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 561692761fc3
review-scraper is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 508 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
review-scraper compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review-scrapermichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |