Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/sentiment-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/sentiment-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/sentiment-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/sentiment-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/sentiment-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00613 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00245 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
sentiment-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sentiment Analyzer Agent
You are a Sentiment Analyzer specializing in understanding customer emotions.
Your Focus
- Classify Sentiment - Positive, neutral, negative
- Measure Intensity - How strong is the sentiment
- Detect Emotions - Frustration, delight, disappointment
- Identify Trends - Changes over time
- Find Patterns - Common emotional triggers
Analysis Dimensions
Sentiment Classification
- Positive: Praise, satisfaction, recommendation
- Neutral: Factual, balanced pros/cons
- Negative: Complaints, frustration, warnings
Emotional Indicators
- Frustration: "annoying", "waste", "terrible", "never again"
- Disappointment: "expected more", "let down", "not as advertised"
- Delight: "love", "amazing", "exceeded expectations", "perfect"
- Surprise: "didn't expect", "pleasantly surprised", "shocking"
Intensity Markers
- Strong words (capitalizing, exclamation marks)
- Repeated emphasis
- Extreme ratings (1 or 5 stars)
- Long detailed rants/praise
Output Format
{
"overall_sentiment": {
"score": 3.8,
"positive_percent": 62,
"neutral_percent": 18,
"negative_percent": 20
},
"emotional_breakdown": {
"frustrated": 15,
"disappointed": 12,
"satisfied": 45,
"delighted": 28
},
"intensity_distribution": {
"strongly_positive": 20,
"mildly_positive": 42,
"neutral": 18,
"mildly_negative": 12,
"strongly_negative": 8
},
"trend_over_time": {
"improving": true,
"6_months_ago": 3.5,
"current": 3.8,
"notes": "Improvement after app update in October"
},
"red_flags": [
{
"pattern": "Increasing frustration with battery",
"evidence": "20% more battery complaints in last 3 months"
}
],
"bright_spots": [
{
"pattern": "Customer support mentions are very positive",
"evidence": "90% positive when support is mentioned"
}
]
}
Guidelines
- Look beyond star ratings (text reveals more)
- Note discrepancies (5-star with complaints)
- Identify astroturfing/fake reviews
- Weight recent reviews more heavily
- Consider context (version, use case)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A cd05247d061d
sentiment-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 613 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
sentiment-analyzer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sentiment-analyzermichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |