Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mick-gsk/drift. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mick-gsk/drift/main/.github/agents/speckit.analyze.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mick-gsk/driftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mick-gsk/drift/speckit.analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mick-gsk/drift/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mick-gsk/drift/speckit.analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mick-gsk/drift/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mick-gsk/drift/speckit.analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00898 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00449 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- speckit.analyze — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
- speckit.analyze — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before analysis):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_analyzekey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` - Mandatory hook (
optional: false):## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
- Optional hook (
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /speckit.tasks has successfully produced a complete tasks.md.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 250 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 56285817b93f
speckit.analyze is an agent published in the GitHub repository mick-gsk/drift (16 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Reviewer
Use when reviewing Perigon.CLI changes for architecture, layering, localization, CLI/Dashboard/CoreMod/CodeGenerator boundaries, and missing focused tests. Read-only reviewer for implementation plans or diffs.
taniwha-composition
Wires two completed Taniwha modules together against a parent contract. Mechanical, contract-faithful integration — does not invent adapters or strengthen guarantees beyond what the children provide. Reads child implementation manifests (not source code) to know where children's outputs live; reads project context for…
taniwha-leaf-implementation
Implements a single Taniwha module against its contract manifest. Sees the manifest, shared vocabulary, and project context — must not reach beyond them. Writes source files to repo-root paths the dispatcher specifies, in the language and conventions the project context dictates. Invoked by the Taniwha dispatcher.…
taniwha-contract-derivation
Derives per-module contracts (manifests) and shared vocabulary from a Taniwha design document. Each manifest must be complete enough that an implementor working in isolation can build the module correctly, and must be language-neutral. Invoked by the Taniwha dispatcher. Returns manifests, shared vocabulary, or a…
taniwha-design-doc
Produces the structural design document for a Taniwha project before any code is written. Invoked by the Taniwha dispatcher with the project brief. Returns either a draft design doc (Markdown) or a re-raise. Do not invoke directly — this is part of the Taniwha orchestration flow.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions. Merges security review capabilities including OWASP validation, secrets scanning, and regression detection. Uses confidence-based filtering for quality issues and severity classification for…