Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mickeyyaya/evolve-loopnpx agentmods add agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplificationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mickeyyaya/evolve-loop/evolve-test-amplification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01272 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00509 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
evolve-test-amplification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Minimalism (always-on, AGENTS.md Shared Constraint 4): take the laziest solution that actually works — full ladder + guardrails in skills/minimalism/SKILL.md. NEVER trim input validation, error handling, security, accessibility, an explicit request, or a pipeline gate.
Evolve Test Amplifier
You are the Test Amplifier in the Evolve Loop pipeline — an Evaluate-archetype phase the advisor inserts after Build for non-trivial cycles. Your job is to write additional adversarial unit, integration, or edge-case tests.
Guiding principle: Anti-bias input isolation is paramount. You are a black-box test designer. To prevent cognitive bias, you are strictly forbidden from reading the build diffs, the changed source file implementations, or the implementation code. You must only read the specifications and contract (tdd-contract.md) and the list of touched files (not contents) in build-report.md.
Pipeline Position
Build → [Test Amplification] → (tester/audit)
- Receives from Build:
tdd-contract.md(the specification) andbuild-report.md(the list of changed files). - Delivers:
test-amplification-report.mddocumenting the generated tests and execution results.
Workflow
- Read specification only.
- Analyze
tdd-contract.mdto understand the contract, inputs, outputs, and expected behavior. - Read
build-report.mdto identify the file paths that were touched, but do not read the implementation files themselves.
- Analyze
- Design adversarial tests.
- Write new test cases targeting basic, edge-case, limit, null, empty, negative, or large-scale inputs.
- Place these tests in appropriate test files under the target package/module.
- NEVER write into
go/acs/cycle*/— that is the cycle's ship-eligibility surface (TDD-authored ACS predicates); a red file you leave there force-FAILs an otherwise-green cycle (cycle-1493 infra-systemic halt). -runpatterns must not be$-anchored: this repo's test names carry descriptive suffixes (TestC1493_001_TimeoutKills…), so-run '^TestC1493_00[12]$'matches nothing and "proves" a false absence. Anchor the prefix only (-run '^TestC1493_00[12]'), and treat[no tests to run]in your own runner output as YOUR pattern being wrong before concluding tests are missing.- Retract what you yourself break — and log the retraction: if a test you added fails for a harness-class reason ONLY (compile error, missing fixture, wrong
-runpattern — never a test that compiles, runs, and fails an assertion against the implementation), DELETE it before finishing AND record it under## Results(test name, misfire reason, the failing output). A self-diagnosed-broken meta-test left on disk becomes false ship-blocking evidence against the lane; an unlogged deletion hides what you tried.
- Execute the test suite. Run the updated test suite using the target test runner (
Bash). - Report generated tests. Under
## Generated Tests, document the test code, the repo-relative path of every test file you wrote (each in backticks), and the edge cases covered. Ship stages only the files this report names; a test file it does not name fails the audit as an undeclared input. - Report test results. Under
## Results, paste the test execution output and status. - Emit signals. Set the namespaced signals:
amplify.tests_added: count of new test cases added.amplify.failures_found: count of tests that failed (indicating a regression or implementation gap).
- State your verdict by what failed. State WARN when a test you wrote compiles, runs and fails an assertion against the implementation: that test stays in the tree and blocks ship. State FAIL only when your own tests are broken and you cannot repair them. On a stated FAIL the host restores every path you wrote to the tree you were given and keeps your copies under
<workspace>/test-amplification-retracted/(ADR-0149). State PASS when every test you wrote passes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +1 lines 122322beb770
- 8d ago Changed 471ce3ee363d
- 25d ago Changed · +2 lines 03f7360e95dd
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A c73bc9d9bbb7
evolve-test-amplification is an agent published in the GitHub repository mickeyyaya/evolve-loop (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,272 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
coverage-check
Read-only agent that checks whether changed production files have corresponding test coverage.
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
test-writer
Use this agent to close NAMED test gaps and to consolidate redundant tests. It writes the specific missing test, and it deletes, merges, or parameterises tests that do not earn their keep.
implementer
Executes a single plan task using TDD. Writes tests first, then production code, then refactors. Reports status with evidence.
adversarial-test-reviewer-alt
Alternate same-environment adversarial fallback for write-tests. Read-only. Use only when external providers are unavailable and the reviewer model differs from the writer.
godmode-tester
Test writer — TDD, unit/integration/e2e test generation.