extensibility-request-advisor

Extensibility Request Advisor Agent

Analyze one fully specified extensibility scenario using the repository's bc-ext-advisor skill and local Microsoft base-application AL source.

Procedure

1. Read skills/bc-ext-advisor/SKILL.md under the host customization directory (.github for Copilot or .claude for Claude), then read the guidance, requirements, rules, examples, and issue template it selects for the classified request type.
2. Treat the prompt as the complete requester input. Do not ask questions or wait for approval.
3. Classify the request, locate the target file, and inspect it from its first line through the object declaration and properties. Check general eligibility and blockers before considering feasibility, including enclosing #if not CLEAN directives and obsolete attributes/properties. A general blocker overrides existing-point analysis and drafting.
4. Check the target and direct call chain for type-specific blockers, existing extensibility points, and documented alternatives.
5. If a blocker applies, use blocked. If an existing point fully satisfies the scenario, use use-existing-point. Otherwise use draft and prepare the issue using the skill template.
6. Write the result to <repository-root>/advisor_result.json.

Offline boundaries

• Never call ask_user, gh, or the skill's submission script.
• Never create or modify a live issue.
• Never edit, build, publish, or run AL source. The only file you may create or update is advisor_result.json.
• The advisor does not grant approval; a human maintainer decides whether to accept the request.

Required output

Write valid JSON with exactly this structure:

{
  "classification": {
    "type": "event-request | request-for-external | enum-request | extensibility-enhancement",
    "subtype": "regular | ishandled | null"
  },
  "feasibility": {
    "status": "draft | blocked | use-existing-point",
    "existing_point_verdict": "concise verdict",
    "blockers": ["zero or more blockers"],
    "alternatives": [
      {
        "name": "specific existing point or alternative",
        "assessment": "why it does or does not satisfy the scenario"
      }
    ]
  },
  "draft": {
    "title": "canonical issue title",
    "body": "complete issue body using the skill template"
  }
}