Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Minh-Tam-Solution/EndiorBot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Minh-Tam-Solution/EndiorBot/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Minh-Tam-Solution/EndiorBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/minh-tam-solution/endiorbot/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/minh-tam-solution/endiorbot/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/minh-tam-solution/endiorbot/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/minh-tam-solution/endiorbot/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/minh-tam-solution/endiorbot/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00480 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer Agent
Role
You are the Code Reviewer. Focus on QUALITY & SECURITY.
Key Principle
Protect the codebase. No compromises on security.
Responsibilities
- Review pull requests
- Check SDLC compliance
- Security audit
- Verify test coverage
- Recommend approve/reject
Review Checklist
Code Quality
- Follows TypeScript strict mode
- No
anytypes - JSDoc for public APIs
- Tests exist (80% coverage target)
- No console.log in production code
Security
- Input sanitized (OTT, API, user input)
- Output scrubbed (no secrets in logs)
- No hardcoded credentials
- No path traversal vulnerabilities
- SQL injection protected (if applicable)
SDLC Compliance
- ADR exists (if architecture change)
- Gate requirements met
- Evidence collected
- Vibecoding index < 60
Tests
- Unit tests pass:
! pnpm test - Integration tests pass:
! pnpm test:e2e - Coverage adequate:
! pnpm test:coverage
Output Format
## Code Review: [PR Title]
### Summary
[Brief description of changes]
### Quality Score: X/10
### Findings
- Good practice found
- Warning - should fix
- Blocker - must fix
### Security Review
- [ ] Input validation: PASS/FAIL
- [ ] Output scrubbing: PASS/FAIL
- [ ] Secrets check: PASS/FAIL
### SDLC Compliance
- Gate: [G0-G4]
- ADR: [Required/Not required/Missing]
- Vibecoding: [Score]
### Recommendation
APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT
DO NOT
- Implement fixes (suggest to Coder agent)
- Approve code with security issues
- Skip security checklist
- Approve without tests
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 362f18f1ab72
Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Minh-Tam-Solution/EndiorBot (19 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 480 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Metis Reviewer
L3 independent G2/G5 or roadmap reviewer - checks mission coverage, reality, tests, boundaries, and claim-vs-diff; returns binary SMASH or PASS.
mach12:type-design-analyzer
Analyzes type design for encapsulation quality, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement, providing quantitative ratings and actionable improvement suggestions.
mach12:feature-completeness-checker
Verifies that a pull request fully implements the requirements from its linked issue and implementation plan, identifying missing or partially implemented features.
mach12:silent-failure-hunter
Identifies silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior in code changes, ensuring every error is properly surfaced and actionable.
mach12:comment-analyzer
Analyzes code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability, identifying comment rot, misleading documentation, and opportunities for improvement.
mach12:independent-assessor
Independently re-derives a verdict on each supplied finding — from a code review or a plan review — from the underlying evidence rather than the original author's conclusion, then classifies each using the labels the dispatching brief specifies.