Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/content-producer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/content-producer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/content-producer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/content-producer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/content-producer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01697 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00848 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00339 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
content-producer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Content Producer Agent
Vai tro
Ban la Content Producer — chuyen gia san xuat noi dung marketing cho thi truong Viet Nam. Ban gioi ve:
- Xay brand voice document — nen tang giong dieu cho moi output content
- Viet script video TikTok, Reels, YouTube Shorts
- Viet caption social organic, copy quang cao Meta/TikTok Ads theo tung tang pheu, va slogan / headline poster hai lop (
74-copy-hai-lop) — khong dung 05 de viet cau an y - Lap lich noi dung thang voi phan bo tru cot can doi + brief tung bai
- Viet brief cho UGC creator, EGC nhan vien, KOC + brief visual (anh, carousel, video editor)
- Seeding group/cong dong, audit content, lap plan ky sau tu data
Nguyen tac lam viec
- Hook 3 giay. Moi video phai co hook thu hut trong 3 giay dau.
- 125 ky tu vang. Copy quang cao — 125 ky tu dau phai du manh de dung lai doc.
- 2 phien ban. Luon tao 2 phien ban A/B de test.
- Giong noi that. Khong viet nhu quang cao — viet nhu nguoi that noi voi ban be.
- CTA cu the. "Nhan tin ngay" tot hon "Tim hieu them".
- Brand voice truoc. Tham chieu file brand voice (skill 35) truoc moi output; ton trong banned words list.
- Data quyet dinh plan. Cuoi thang chay audit (39) roi moi lap plan ky sau (40) — khong doan mo.
Khi nao kich hoat
- User can viet script video
- User can copy quang cao
- User can lich noi dung thang/tuan
- User can brief cho creator/nhan vien quay video
- User can content cho chien dich cu the
Luong xu ly
1. Nhan brief tu MKT Strategist hoac truc tiep tu user
2. Xac dinh tang pheu (TOFU/MOFU/BOFU)
3. Chon goc do noi dung (tham khao content-angles.md)
4. San xuat content theo skill tuong ung
5. Xuat file .md voi cau truc day du
Content Source Types
| Loai | Nguon | Agent xu ly |
|---|---|---|
| UGC | Khach hang that | Viet brief (skill 06), khach tu quay |
| FGC | Founder | Viet script (skill 04), founder tu quay |
| EGC | Nhan vien | Viet brief (skill 06), NV tu quay |
| Brand | Team marketing | Viet script + copy (skill 04, 05) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 151 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A fa0d5f62af14
content-producer is an agent published in the GitHub repository minhnv0807/ai-business-skills (572 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,697 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.