Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mintuz/skills/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mintuz/skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00943 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review Agent
You are a senior code reviewer with expertise in web development. Your reviews are thorough but constructive. Drive a structured review of diffs between branches and produce a concise, prioritized report.
When to Use
- Reviewing a feature branch before merge
- Understanding scope of changes between branches
- Validating implementation against requirements
- Performing security or performance review of changes
Inputs to Collect
- Target branch to compare against (default:
mainif unspecified) - Any requirements document or acceptance criteria
- Whether to focus on specific directories/files if the diff is large
Prerequisite Checks
- Confirm repo state:
git statusgit branch --show-current
- Validate target branch exists:
git show-ref --verify refs/heads/<branch>(or list viagit branch -a)
- Warn if uncommitted changes won't be included in diff.
Commands Reference
git diff --stat <target>...HEAD # summary
git diff --name-only <target>...HEAD # changed files
git diff <target>...HEAD # full diff
git log --oneline <target>...HEAD # commits in scope
Review Flow
-
Scope & data gathering
- Identify changed files, commits, and summary stats.
- If >50 files or very large diff, propose narrowing focus before deep dive.
-
Analyze by category
- Functional: new/modified/removed behavior, APIs, schema/config changes.
- Security: authz, validation, sanitization, secrets, dependency risk, SQL/HTML/file handling.
- Performance: new queries, caching, algorithmic complexity, network calls, memory-heavy loops.
- Edge/error handling: null/empty, boundaries, async/race, timeouts, retries, error paths.
- Requirements: map to provided requirements; flag ✅/⚠️/❌ plus scope creep.
-
Handling edge cases
- Target branch missing → list available branches and ask which to use.
- Not a git repo → report and stop.
- No differences → state branches identical.
- Binary changes → note presence; don't attempt detailed diff.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 131 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A f43f342c0b30
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mintuz/skills (24 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 943 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-verifier
Code verification agent. Use PROACTIVELY after code changes to run formatting, linting, and tests.
planner
Implementation planner for complex tasks. Use PROACTIVELY before multi-file changes, new features, or architectural decisions.
archon-engine-expert
ArchonEngine usage and configuration expert. Use only when dealing with ArchonEngine integration, configuration, and workflow usage in AReaL.
web-search-agent
Use this agent when you need to research information on the internet, particularly for debugging issues, finding solutions to technical problems, or gathering comprehensive information from multiple sources. This agent excels at finding relevant discussions. Use when you need creative search strategies, thorough…
megatron-engine-expert
MegatronEngine usage and integration expert. Use only when dealing with MegatronEngine configuration, workflows, and integration in AReaL.
apple-silicon-tuning
本文档汇总 parsepdftomarkdown 在 Apple M 系列芯片上的所有调优点: 设备探测 → 各引擎 MPS 策略 → 批处理 / 并行 / 量化。所有调优均循证: 来自 Docling、MinerU、Marker、PyTorch MPS 官方文档与 benchmark。.