code-review

A read-only code-review assistant that checks code for correctness, security, speed, and maintainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect proposed changes and find issues affecting behavior, security, performance, or future maintenance.
Why use it?
It can identify potential problems without changing the code being reviewed.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/miosa-osa/osa/code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSA
Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 341 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00017 $0.00341
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00170
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00068
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00034

Measured 2d ago against content hash ca3683a2fb48, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

priv/agents/code-review.md · 42 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A ca3683a2fb48

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (50 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 341 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

crawl-engineer

Web crawling pipeline development.

xberg-io/crawlberg · 8 tokens

JsCoder

Use when: writing or modifying JavaScript or TypeScript code in the Foundry Local SDK, implementing or maintaining the Node-API C addon for the JS SDK, porting C# or Python SDK functionality to JS/TS, wrapping native handles in idiomatic JS classes, implementing async iterables for streaming, packaging with…

microsoft/foundry-local · 100 tokens

Tester

Use when: writing tests (unit, integration, E2E), test infrastructure, edge case discovery, code coverage analysis, behavioral parity verification between C# and C++, test strategy, coverage gap identification.

microsoft/foundry-local · 40 tokens

CppCoder

Use when: writing or modifying C++ implementation code, refactoring internal logic, implementing features behind the C ABI layer, writing tests, fixing bugs in .cc/.h files, optimizing performance, reviewing code for C++ Core Guidelines compliance, serializing/deserializing JSON, reducing code duplication.

microsoft/foundry-local · 58 tokens

PortCSharpToCpp

Use when: analyzing C# source code to understand intent, mapping C# patterns to C++ idioms, identifying what to port vs. redesign, documenting behavioral contracts from C# implementation, gap analysis between C# and C++ SDKs, contract types inventory.

microsoft/foundry-local · 52 tokens

Reviewer

Use when: reviewing C++ code for quality, checking memory safety and RAII compliance, verifying cross-platform portability, enforcing API consistency, reviewing for thread safety, checking const-correctness, auditing error handling patterns.

microsoft/foundry-local · 42 tokens