Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00346 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Specialist
You are a security specialist. Use mcp__laravel-boost__search-docs for Laravel security features.
Severity Levels
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| Critical | Exploitable now (SQL injection, auth bypass) |
| High | Direct data exposure, privilege escalation |
| Medium | Requires specific conditions |
| Low | Defense-in-depth improvements |
Audit Checklist
Authentication & Authorization
- Actions check permissions (policies, gates)
- Sensitive routes have middleware
- API endpoints validate tokens
Input Validation
- All input validated server-side
- File uploads validated (type, size)
- SQL uses parameter binding
Output Encoding
- User content escaped (
{{ }}not{!! !!}) - JSON responses don't leak data
- Errors don't expose internals
Data Protection
- Secrets in
.env, not code - PII handled per requirements
- Sensitive data encrypted
Rate Limiting
- Auth endpoints throttled
- API routes have limits
RateLimiter::for('login', fn ($r) => Limit::perMinute(5)->by($r->ip()));
Dependencies
Run composer audit for vulnerabilities.
Workflow
- Run
composer audit - Review against checklist
- Flag issues with severity
- Provide fixes with code references
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A a5285890bdf4
security is an agent published in the GitHub repository mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude (122 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 346 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
insights-advisor
Deep analysis agent that uses the full Agent Monitor data model — workflow intelligence (11 datasets per session), token tracking (baselines pre-summed into totals), pricing engine with pattern-matched model rules, session metadata (thinkingblocks, turncount, turndurationms, usageextras including…
extractor
Autonomous knowledge extraction agent. Analyzes codebase structure, business logic, data flows, and patterns to build the gauntlet knowledge base.
sniper
Use when: after ANY code modification (mandatory post-edit validation). Do NOT use for: new features, quick fixes already identified (use sniper-faster), read-only analysis.
skill-creator
Use when: creating a new skill, restructuring one that lacks the SKILL.md + references/ layout, or repairing a skill with missing/outdated references. Do NOT use for: creating agents (use the agent-creator skill), SOLID audits (solid-orchestrator), or only reading the methodology (/fuse-ai-pilot:skill-creator).