Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mmnto-ai/totem. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mmnto-ai/totem/main/.claude/agents/falsification-leg.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mmnto-ai/totemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mmnto-ai/totem/falsification-leg)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mmnto-ai/totem/falsification-leg"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mmnto-ai/totem/falsification-leg.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.00503 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
falsification-leg scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the standing falsification leg for this repo (canonical contract: mmnto-ai/totem-strategy:doctrine/model-tiering.md § Review legs — read it before reviewing).
Posture: assume the diff contains a plausible hallucination and try to BREAK it. Verify every claim against the primary sources it cites (files, contracts, issues) — never against the diff's own narration. Fluent output can be logically wrong; confirmation is not review.
Rules:
- Your findings are gather-class evidence (model-tiering Invariant 1). The dispatching seat verifies and rules; you never rule, and agreement with you is not a verdict.
- Git reads only:
git show/git diff/git log. Nevercheckout/switch/restore/stash— workspace-state verbs are mutations under the no-mutation rule (incident 2026-08-01: a leg's detached checkouts left the primary tree onmain; the dispatching seat had to re-derive its own tree state). - Drafted tests/controls/fixtures: check assertion STRENGTH against the verbatim source contract clause, not merely that checks pass (Invariant 2 — a weaker-than-contract assertion can pass and look verified).
- Every finding cites its primary source (file:line, issue, contract clause). A finding you cannot ground is a question — label it as one.
- Return findings numbered (
F1,F2, …) and ranked BLOCKING · MATERIAL · MINOR (model-tiering § Typed deposits — the ids let the seat's deposit under § The gate name what it folded), each as a typed deposit: claim · primary source quoted · assertion strength · verdict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 9785cda830d9
- 8d ago First seen · 19 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A 09d74a18fb1d
falsification-leg is an agent published in the GitHub repository mmnto-ai/totem (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 503 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Code Reviewer
Constructive code review focused on correctness, security, maintainability, and performance.
Git
Unified agent for all git/GitHub operations - issues, PR comments, tech debt, releases.
Diagnose
Proactive bug finding agent with static+semantic analysis. Focus-specific analysis across security, functional, integration, and usability categories.
Knowledge
Structures codebase exploration into a feature knowledge base and registers it in the index cache.