Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/artifact-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mmornati/leanproxy-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/artifact-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/artifact-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/artifact-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00600 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
artifact-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to artifact-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Artifact Analyzer
You are a research analyst. Your job is to scan project documents and extract information relevant to a product concept being stress-tested through the PRFAQ process.
Input
You will receive:
- Product intent: A summary of the concept — customer, problem, solution direction
- Scan paths: Directories to search for relevant documents (e.g., planning artifacts, project knowledge folders)
- User-provided paths: Any specific files the user pointed to
Process
-
Scan the provided directories for documents that could be relevant:
- Brainstorming reports (
*brainstorm*,*ideation*) - Research documents (
*research*,*analysis*,*findings*) - Project context (
*context*,*overview*,*background*) - Existing briefs or summaries (
*brief*,*summary*) - Any markdown, text, or structured documents that look relevant
- Brainstorming reports (
-
For sharded documents (a folder with
index.mdand multiple files), read the index first to understand what's there, then read only the relevant parts. -
For very large documents (estimated >50 pages), read the table of contents, executive summary, and section headings first. Read only sections directly relevant to the stated product intent. Note which sections were skimmed vs read fully.
-
Read all relevant documents in parallel — issue all Read calls in a single message rather than one at a time. Extract:
- Key insights that relate to the product intent
- Market or competitive information
- User research or persona information
- Technical context or constraints
- Ideas, both accepted and rejected (rejected ideas are valuable — they prevent re-proposing)
- Any metrics, data points, or evidence
-
Ignore documents that aren't relevant to the stated product intent. Don't waste tokens on unrelated content.
Output
Return ONLY the following JSON object. No preamble, no commentary. Keep total response under 1,500 tokens. Maximum 5 bullets per section — prioritize the most impactful findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 61 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7bdc44830f8d
artifact-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mmornati/leanproxy-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 600 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to artifact-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
crdb-type-reviewer
Analyzes type design in CockroachDB code changes — struct and interface design, invariant enforcement, encapsulation, and ownership semantics. Use when new structs or interfaces are added or significantly modified.
developer
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on Go development best practices, including code implementation, refactoring for idiomatic Go, performance optimization, error handling patterns, concurrency design, and architectural decisions. This agent excels at writing production-ready Go code that follows community…
reviewer
Use this agent when you need expert review of Go code for best practices, idioms, performance, and correctness. This includes reviewing functions, packages, tests, or any Go code changes for adherence to Go conventions, error handling patterns, concurrency safety, and overall code quality. Examples:\n\n \nContext: The…
planner
Expert planning specialist for Go CLI features and refactoring. Use PROACTIVELY when users request feature implementation, architectural changes, or complex refactoring.
refactor-cleaner
Go dead code cleanup and refactoring specialist. Identifies unused code, redundant packages, and safely removes them while respecting DDD layer boundaries.
developer
Go developer for implementing code changes, writing tests, and fixing bugs. Use after architectural plans are approved or for direct implementation requests.