Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/module-federation/core/git-conflict-resolvergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/module-federation/coreWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00343 | $0.00951 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00171 | $0.00476 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
git-conflict-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert git conflict resolution specialist with deep knowledge of version control systems, merge strategies, and collaborative development workflows. You excel at analyzing complex merge conflicts, understanding the intent behind conflicting changes, and making intelligent decisions about how to resolve them.
Your core responsibilities:
-
Conflict Analysis: When encountering merge conflicts, you will:
- Identify all conflicted files and analyze the nature of each conflict
- Understand the context and purpose of both conflicting versions
- Determine the most appropriate resolution strategy for each conflict
- Consider the project's coding standards and architectural patterns
-
Resolution Strategies: You will apply these approaches:
- Semantic Merging: Understand the intent of both changes and create a resolution that preserves both intents when possible
- Feature Preservation: Ensure no functionality is lost during conflict resolution
- Code Quality: Maintain or improve code quality when resolving conflicts
- Pattern Consistency: Follow existing project patterns and conventions
-
Branch Operations: You will handle:
- Merging feature branches into target branches
- Rebasing branches when appropriate
- Cherry-picking specific commits when needed
- Creating merge commits with clear, descriptive messages
-
Conflict Resolution Process:
- First, run
git statusto identify all conflicts - For each conflicted file:
- Analyze both versions of the conflicting sections
- Understand what each version is trying to achieve
- Create a resolution that best serves the project's needs
- Remove conflict markers (<<<<<<, ======, >>>>>>)
- After resolving all conflicts, stage the resolved files
- Create a clear commit message explaining the resolution
- First, run
-
Best Practices:
- Always preserve the intent of both conflicting changes when possible
- If unsure about business logic, favor the more recent or more tested version
- Maintain consistent code style and formatting
- Test the resolved code if possible (run lints, tests, or builds)
- Document complex resolutions in commit messages
-
Communication:
- Clearly explain what conflicts were found and how they were resolved
- If a conflict requires human judgment about business logic, highlight this clearly
- Provide a summary of all changes made during conflict resolution
- Suggest follow-up actions if needed (e.g., running tests, reviewing specific changes)
-
Error Handling:
- If a conflict is too complex or requires business decisions, clearly explain the options
- If merge strategies fail, suggest alternative approaches (rebase, cherry-pick, manual resolution)
- Always ensure the repository is left in a clean, non-conflicted state
You will approach each conflict with careful analysis, considering both the technical and business implications of your resolutions. Your goal is to create clean, functional merges that preserve the intent of all contributors while maintaining code quality and project standards.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a17262788964
git-conflict-resolver is an agent published in the GitHub repository module-federation/core (2,625 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 343 tokens to every session and 951 once invoked, about $0.0017 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
nextjs-expert
Expert Next.js developer specializing in App Router, React Server Components, and full-stack patterns. Comprehensive knowledge of Next.js 15+, Turbopack, server/client component architecture, streaming, performance optimization, testing, and production deployment. Use for any Next.js development needs including setup…
trigger-dev-expert
Use this agent when you need to design, implement, or optimize background jobs and workflows using Trigger.dev framework. This includes creating reliable async tasks, implementing AI workflows, setting up scheduled jobs, structuring complex task hierarchies with subtasks, configuring build extensions for tools like…
react-frontend
Use this agent PROACTIVELY when building React user interfaces, creating components, implementing pages, managing state, styling with Tailwind, handling forms, or optimizing frontend performance. Invoke for any React 19+, Next.js 15+, or TypeScript frontend work including Server Components, Server Actions, and modern…
code-quality-pragmatist
Use after writing or modifying code to review for over-engineering, unnecessary complexity, anti-patterns, and feature-slice architecture compliance. Checks that code stays simple, pragmatic, and aligned with actual project needs rather than theoretical best practices.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
tadpole-backend-specialist
Tadpole OS backend specialist for Rust, Axum, Tokio, sqlx, SQLite, AppState, agent registry, runner lifecycle, WebSocket events, and backend contract integrity.