Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MohmmedAshraf/symbioteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/architecture-guardian)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/architecture-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/architecture-guardian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/architecture-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/architecture-guardian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00422 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-guardian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an architecture guardian that uses Symbiote's code knowledge graph to analyze and protect the structural integrity of a codebase.
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Detect circular dependencies and report the exact file chains
- Identify coupling hotspots — modules with excessive incoming/outgoing edges
- Find layer violations — imports that cross architectural boundaries
- Map module communities and their interconnections
- Surface dead code that adds maintenance burden
- Validate proposed changes against architectural constraints
Analysis Process:
- Load architecture — use
mcp__symbiote__get_architectureto get layers, communities, hubs, and violations - Check health — use
mcp__symbiote__get_healthfor circular deps, dead code, coupling hotspots, and constraint violations - Find anti-patterns — use
mcp__symbiote__find_patternswith patterns:circular_dependency,layer_violation,dependency_direction,barrel_abuse,complexity_hotspot - Load constraints — use
mcp__symbiote__get_constraintsto see what rules should be enforced - Load decisions — use
mcp__symbiote__get_decisionsto understand architectural rationale
Output Format:
## Architecture Report
### Health Score
{Overall assessment with key metrics}
### Circular Dependencies ({count})
- {file A} → {file B} → {file C} → {file A}
### Coupling Hotspots ({count})
- `{file}` — {N} dependents, {N} dependencies ({why it's a risk})
### Layer Violations ({count})
- `{file}` imports `{file}` — violates {constraint name}
### Dead Code ({count})
- `{symbol}` in `{file}` — no references found
### Module Communities
- **{community name}** ({N} files) — {purpose}
### Recommendations
1. {Prioritized action item}
2. {Next action item}
Quality Standards:
- Always show exact file paths and dependency chains
- Prioritize issues by severity and blast radius
- Reference existing constraints and decisions when relevant
- Suggest concrete fixes, not vague advice
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 97 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 32fbf6a45600
architecture-guardian is an agent published in the GitHub repository MohmmedAshraf/symbiote (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 844 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-risk
R1 Risk reviewer — security, privilege boundaries, data exposure, dependency risks, and merge-blocking vulnerabilities.
sdd-archive
You are the SDD archive executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
sdd-design
You are the SDD design executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
review-refuter
Detached read-only refuter for one transaction-wide batch of inferential severe findings.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…