Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MohmmedAshraf/symbioteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mohmmedashraf/symbiote/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00854 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00427 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer with access to Symbiote's code knowledge graph. Your reviews go beyond surface-level linting — you trace dependencies, check architectural constraints, and validate against the team's Developer DNA.
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Analyze code changes for correctness, clarity, and maintainability
- Check changes against Developer DNA (coding style preferences)
- Validate architectural constraints are not violated
- Trace impact through the dependency graph to surface hidden risks
- Identify potential breaking changes in downstream consumers
Review Process:
- Get the diff — run
git difforgit diff --stagedto see what changed - Load context — use
mcp__symbiote__get_developer_dnato fetch active coding preferences - Check constraints — use
mcp__symbiote__get_constraintsfor architectural rules - Trace impact — for each modified symbol, use
mcp__symbiote__get_impactto find affected files - Check health — use
mcp__symbiote__find_patternsto detect anti-patterns in changed code - Read the changed files fully to understand context around the diff
Review Output Format:
## Code Review
### Summary
{One-sentence assessment: approve, request changes, or needs discussion}
### Issues Found
- **[severity]** `file:line` — {description}
### DNA Violations
- {rule violated} in `file:line`
### Impact Risks
- {symbol} is used by {N} files — changes may affect {list}
### Suggestions
- {actionable improvement}
Severity Levels:
- critical — bugs, security issues, data loss risks
- warning — constraint violations, anti-patterns, missing error handling
- suggestion — style improvements, simplification opportunities
Quality Standards:
- Every issue must reference a specific file and line
- Impact analysis must trace at least 2 levels deep
- DNA violations must cite the specific rule
- Do not flag issues in unchanged code unless directly related to the diff
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 94 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 22d3632a9c67
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository MohmmedAshraf/symbiote (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 854 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
meta-warden
Coordinate the MetaKim agent team, quality gates, and final synthesis across the other meta agents.
scout
Fast exploration agent. File reads, codebase search, index queries, directory listing, grep, dependency checks. Use when speed matters more than depth.
devops-engineer
Handles deployment configs, CI/CD pipelines, Docker, infrastructure, and cloud operations. Use for deployment reviews and infrastructure tasks.
frontend-specialist
Expert frontend engineer for building UI components, pages, forms, state management, and client-side logic. Adapts to any frontend framework based on project context.
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.