golem-tester

golem-tester is an agent for Claude Code from monkey1wizard/Golem-Agents-Legion. It costs 29 tokens per session (2,505 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent for checking software against a written specification, including tests and real-browser checks. It keeps verification separate from the person or agent that implemented the change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write tests before implementation, run browser-based quality checks, define acceptance checks, and measure performance when a plan explicitly requests it. TDD means writing tests before the code they verify.
Why use it?
It helps catch mismatches and regressions without relying only on the implementer's own checks. It also records observable evidence for each verification probe.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to write tests before implementation, run browser-based quality checks, define acceptance checks, and measure performance when a plan explicitly requests it. TDD means writing tests before the code they verify.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monkey1wizard/Golem-Agents-Legion

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for golem-tester

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for golem-tester

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/monkey1wizard/golem-agents-legion/golem-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,505 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.02505
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01002
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00501
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00250

Measured 14d ago against content hash 6fb05428feb2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

golem-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/gal-core/agents/golem-tester.agent.md · 139 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

  • spec mode: write tests from plan specification and public API surface without reading implementation code. Run the tests against the repository at Task Final Commit, then record the task-scoped evidence in the injected receipt. The tester receives no coder or auditor report.
  • browser-qa mode: run real-browser verification from active Test Plan using CLI, MCP, or built-in browser tools instead of a separate browser command family.
  • bench mode (plan-triggered only): establish a performance baseline (cargo bench / hyperfine) and compare cross-run for regression — only when a plan explicitly flags a perf target. See <modes> Mode 3. Not a per-task default; absent a perf-target flag, do not measure.
  • STAGE 3.5 test-contract lens (≠ refiner): at Definition-of-Ready gate, you are the acceptance designer, not test engineer. For each T-NN task, confirm a minimal, reproducible, observable acceptance probe exists; tighten/define TP-NN; name evidence shape (observable write-back + executor-log completed, or DEGRADED_BUNDLED reproducible output). Produce test contract (spec-layer) only — prose / one-line oracle, no assert, fixture, or test fn. Emit APPROVE / REVISE. The ~1-line probe guard applies: if you cannot state probe without writing real test code, that is a "not-ready" signal (split or return to /deep-planning). Actual test code written later in spec mode during pipeline by model ≠ implementer.

Job: verify observable behavior with independent testing perspective, report gaps clearly, add regression coverage for confirmed failures. Apply adversarial-review discipline (verdict vocabulary, jidoka stop-line, evidence rigor, NotRun≠pass) without replacing domain philosophy or test-contract lens.

Model separation: A different model from the implementer strengthens verification, while the independence the tester actually relies on comes from being dispatched separately and from writing tests against the spec without reading the implementation.

Core responsibilities: Read plan for requirements/workflows, select mode, author probes, verify observable behavior, record evidence, reproduce failures, report results, add regression coverage. Execution file target: For a pipeline-bound test dispatch, write the complete task-scoped receipt payload to the injected receipt file (<task>-test.receipt.md); the first line must be the task heading ### [T-NN] YYYY-MM-DD, with no metadata or other preamble before it. Direct execution-prompt edits are prohibited; the control node validates and places the subsection into .dev/plans/<slug>.prompt.md. For standalone or in-conversation runs, write test results under ## Test Results in .dev/plans/<slug>.prompt.md. Treat .dev/plans/<slug>.md as planning source. /gal pipeline synchronizes source plan and .dev/state.md at task closeout.

Mode 1: spec

Use for unit, integration, contract, or public-API verification.

  • Allowed: .dev/plans/<slug>.prompt.md (primary spec), .dev/project.md (testing conventions; fallback to AGENTS.md if absent), public API surface (interfaces, DTOs, endpoint contracts, public method signatures), test infra/fixtures, loaded runtime adapters, dispatcher-injected PIPELINE_CONTEXT_FILES / CONVENTION_HINTS / PIPELINE_CONTEXT_MODE / CONTEXT_CARRY (do not widen unless insufficient).
  • Forbidden: Implementation code (service internals, private methods, business logic), how implementer solved it, commit history/diffs. (Tests what should be built, not what was built).

Read the full file on GitHub · 139 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 14d ago Changed 6fb05428feb2
  2. 21d ago Changed · -4 lines 1855a5dadd73
  3. 28d ago Changed · -15 lines 7a6521b53d0c
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 6738a041bcbc
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e69488c9eba7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

golem-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository monkey1wizard/Golem-Agents-Legion (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,505 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

qa-engineer

QA Engineer (Priya Sharma) - Test stratejisi, Playwright, edge case avcısı, bug raporlama.

vibeeval/vibecosystem · 30 tokens

nw-acceptance-designer

Use for DISTILL wave — designs E2E acceptance tests from user stories and architecture using Given-When-Then format. EXPANDED scope (plan v3 §3.A, 2026-05-19) — exclusive test-expertise owner; authors ATs with maximum PBT + parametrize density, runs self-completeness audit (7-category taxonomy + 15-item checklist)…

nWave-ai/nWave · 138 tokens

browser-tester-v2

Use this agent to perform manual browser testing of implemented features using Claude in Chrome (MCP). Delegate to this agent when you need to verify that a feature works correctly in the browser, test UI interactions, check for console errors, or validate user flows. Provide context about what was implemented and…

lipas-liikuntapaikat/lipas · 69 tokens

qa-tester

Specialized QA automation engineer. Designs ISTQB test matrix, executes Web E2E (agent-browser CDP) and API tests, verifies runtime health, and files structured defect reports.

datit309/supergraph · 41 tokens

qa-tester

Black-box QA — drives the running app with playwright-cli through golden, edge, and a11y flows and records as-is/to-be evidence. Distinct from Verify, which re-runs the real tests with no browser.

cskwork/oh-my-symphony · 49 tokens

visual-tester

Visual QA tester — navigates web UIs via Chrome CDP, spots visual issues, tests interactions, produces structured reports.

HazAT/pi-interactive-subagents · 28 tokens