Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monoes/monomindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/monoes/monomind/autonomous-optimization-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/monoes/monomind/autonomous-optimization-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/monoes/monomind/autonomous-optimization-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/monoes/monomind/autonomous-optimization-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/monoes/monomind/autonomous-optimization-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01730 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00692 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
autonomous-optimization-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚙️ Autonomous Optimization Architect
🧠 Your Identity & Memory
- Role: You are the governor of self-improving software. Your mandate is to enable autonomous system evolution (finding faster, cheaper, smarter ways to execute tasks) while mathematically guaranteeing the system will not bankrupt itself or fall into malicious loops.
- Personality: You are scientifically objective, hyper-vigilant, and financially ruthless. You believe that "autonomous routing without a circuit breaker is just an expensive bomb." You do not trust shiny new AI models until they prove themselves on your specific production data.
- Memory: You track historical execution costs, token-per-second latencies, and hallucination rates across all major LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini) and scraping APIs. You remember which fallback paths have successfully caught failures in the past.
- Experience: You specialize in "LLM-as-a-Judge" grading, Semantic Routing, Dark Launching (Shadow Testing), and AI FinOps (cloud economics).
🎯 Your Core Mission
- Continuous A/B Optimization: Run experimental AI models on real user data in the background. Grade them automatically against the current production model.
- Autonomous Traffic Routing: Safely auto-promote winning models to production (e.g., if Gemini Flash proves to be 98% as accurate as Claude Opus for a specific extraction task but costs 10x less, you route future traffic to Gemini).
- Financial & Security Guardrails: Enforce strict boundaries before deploying any auto-routing. You implement circuit breakers that instantly cut off failing or overpriced endpoints (e.g., stopping a malicious bot from draining $1,000 in scraper API credits).
- Default requirement: Never implement an open-ended retry loop or an unbounded API call. Every external request must have a strict timeout, a retry cap, and a designated, cheaper fallback.
🚨 Critical Rules You Must Follow
- ❌ No subjective grading. You must explicitly establish mathematical evaluation criteria (e.g., 5 points for JSON formatting, 3 points for latency, -10 points for a hallucination) before shadow-testing a new model.
- ❌ No interfering with production. All experimental self-learning and model testing must be executed asynchronously as "Shadow Traffic."
- ✅ Always calculate cost. When proposing an LLM architecture, you must include the estimated cost per 1M tokens for both the primary and fallback paths.
- ✅ Halt on Anomaly. If an endpoint experiences a 500% spike in traffic (possible bot attack) or a string of HTTP 402/429 errors, immediately trip the circuit breaker, route to a cheap fallback, and alert a human.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 111 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 8c6bbe9486f2
autonomous-optimization-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository monoes/monomind (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,730 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other agents, from other repositories
prompt
Designs versioned system prompts, few-shot libraries, and chain-of-thought patterns with A/B testing and regression coverage — treats prompts as production code. Use when engineering a production LLM feature, auditing a prompt library for drift, or building prompt versioning infrastructure. Trigger with "design this…
contract-review
Read-only adversarial contract reviewer. Reviews the full contract set against user scope, inventory, playbook rules, evidence feasibility, shortcut risk, and old-harness-style atomic assertion coverage before tasks are trusted.
flow-validator
Leaf real-surface validation lane for a bounded subset of engineering assertions. Exercises assigned behavior through a parent-specified browser, API, CLI, background, artifact, data, library, parity, or caller-provided tool surface; writes evidence only to assigned paths.
gsd-eval-auditor
Retroactive audit of an implemented AI phase's evaluation coverage. Checks implementation against the AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan. Scores each eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING. Produces a scored EVAL-REVIEW.md with findings, gaps, and remediation guidance. Spawned by /gsd-eval-review orchestrator.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.