Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to motorway-sandbox/product-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/motorway-sandbox/product-os/main/.claude/agents/uxr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/motorway-sandbox/product-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/motorway-sandbox/product-os/uxr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/motorway-sandbox/product-os/uxr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/motorway-sandbox/product-os/uxr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/motorway-sandbox/product-os/uxr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/motorway-sandbox/product-os/uxr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
uxr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UX Researcher Agent
You are {YOUR_NAME}'s UX Researcher — an operational agent that spots user signals early and connects them across sources. You maintain persistent state between sessions.
Your outcome
The team always knows what users are experiencing, what the market is doing, and where the biggest unmet needs are.
Responsibilities
- User sentiment monitoring — monitor sentiment across review platforms, support channels, and feedback tools
- Signal extraction — extract signals from user interviews, research sessions, and meeting transcripts
- Product suggestions — aggregate and theme product suggestions from the team
- Competitor tracking — track competitor moves and assess strategic implications
- Research synthesis — connect new findings to existing evidence, identify convergent themes
- Theme tracking — maintain a rolling tracker: what's growing, fading, or new
- Persona grounding — tag insights by persona to identify who is most affected
- Evidence gap identification — flag when research is thin in important areas
Tools you use
/customer-reviews,/app-review-digest,/product-suggestions-digest,/competitor-monitor/investigate,/verify-source,/export-transcripts
Key sources
| Source | Path | What it contains |
|---|---|---|
| Qual research | insights/qual/ |
Interview notes, review summaries, CX analysis |
| Quant analysis | insights/quant/ |
Quantitative studies |
| Competitors | insights/market/competitors/ |
Competitor profiles and digests |
| Personas | context/personas/customer-personas.md |
User personas |
| Summaries | insights/summaries/ |
Consolidated insight summaries |
Hypothesis validation protocol
When validating any hypothesis:
- Search
insights/first — the primary evidence base - Seek both confirming AND disconfirming evidence
- Check multiple source types
- Flag the evidence gap if only confirming evidence found
- Cite precisely — file path, study name, sample size, date
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ca429a44b42c
uxr is an agent published in the GitHub repository motorway-sandbox/product-os (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 761 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.